Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2011 Aug 31;478(7367):97–102. doi: 10.1038/nature10406

Table 2. Comparisons of the height, weight and BMI distributions in duplication carriers and controls.

The available BMI, weight and height data for duplication carriers were transformed to Z-scores using gender- and age-matched reference populations, and one-sided t-tests were carried out to determine whether the mean Z-scores deviate from zero. Significant differences were identified by reference to cutoffs controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) at 5% (see Methods): BMI – 0.022; weight – 0.032; height – 0.025 (significant results indicated in bold). Data were not available for all subjects.

Combined2 DD/ID or psychiatric2 Non-medically ascertained3

Strata Mean Z-score p-value N1 Mean Z-score p-value N1 Mean Z-score p-value N1
BMI All −0.47 2.0e-03 102 −0.56 4.1e-03 76 −0.45 6.0e-03 40
Male −0.54 2.1e-02 52 −0.71 1.3e-02 43 −0.31 2.0e-01 14
Female −0.4 1.8e-02 50 −0.37 8.3e-02 33 −0.52 4.2e-03 26

Weight All −0.56 4.4e-04 104 −0.65 1.3e-03 78 −0.61 3.0e-03 40
Male −0.64 5.8e-03 53 −0.79 4.4e-03 44 −0.57 8.8e-02 14
Female −0.47 1.7e-02 51 −0.47 6.5e-02 34 −0.63 8.6e-03 26

Height All −0.24 4.8e-02 103 −0.33 3.6e-02 77 −0.15 1.8e-01 40
Male −0.34 4.5e-02 52 −0.4 4.6e-02 43 −0.29 1.2e-01 14
Female −0.14 2.6e-01 51 −0.24 2.1e-01 34 −0.07 3.7e-01 26
1

Relatives of probands were excluded as required, to avoid including more than one member of the same family in a single analysis

2

Including 24 cases from the literature (Supplementary Table S3).

3

Population-based cases and first-degree relatives of probands.