Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 19;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-58

Table 5.

Expected impact of availability of QoL data

  n (%)* Obstetricians
Neonatologists
Paediatric neurologists
p
n 1(%)* n 2(%)*
n 3(%)*
Impact on society
 
 
 
 
 
• Provide information on the children’s outcome
72 (93.5)
19 (100)
43 (97.7)
10 (71.4)
0.004
• Make EP Children concern of society
64 (83.1)
16 (84.2)
36 (81.8)
12 (85.7)
NS
Impact on the family
 
 
 
 
 
• Change the way parents see their child’s outcome
59 (76.7)
14 (73.7)
34 (77.3)
11 (78.6)
NS
• Improve support and help to the family
71 (92.2)
18 (94.7)
39 (88.6)
14 (100)
NS
Medical impact
 
 
 
 
 
• Provide overall knowledge of the outcome of EP Children
77 (100)
19 (100)
44 (100)
14 (100)
NS
• Enhance the professional’s intuitive assessment
54 (75.0)
9 (56.3)
34 (81.0)
11 (78.6)
NS
• Integrate the concept of QoL in care practices
66 (86.9)
16 (88.9)
36 (81.8)
14 (100)
NS
• Give back the patient the feeling that he/she is central to the physician’s preoccupations
48 (65.7)
8 (50.0)
31 (72,1)
9 (64.3)
NS
• Improve communication between the care team, the child and the family
66 (85.8)
18 (94.7)
34 (77.3)
14 (100)
NS
• Give parents more precise information on the outcome of their child
64 (83.2)
19 (100)
34 (77.3)
11 (78.6)
0.046
• Rekindle ethical debate on neonatal resuscitation practices
68 (88.3)
17 (89.5)
39 (88.6)
12 (85.8)
NS
• Makes no contribution to my practice 5 (6.6) 0 (0.0) 5 (11.4) 0 (0.0) NS

*% of responders to the question.

QoL, quality of life.

EP Children, extremely preterm children.