Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 11;13:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-81

Table 2.

Results from parentage analysis of offspring born during direct competition

Response variable Source DF DFden F P
Litter size
 
Sweep*
4
92.4
0.64
0.64
Maternal treatment
1
93
0.63
0.43
Litter type (mixed or pure)
1
92
10.3
0.0019
Maternal treatment × litter type
1
92.0
0.93
0.34
No. pups per mixed litter
 
Sweep
4
12.7
0.36
0.83
Maternal treatment
1
51.5
0.33
0.57
Paternal treatment
1
51
0.87
0.35
Maternal × paternal treatment
1
51
1.61
0.21
No. pups per pure litter
 
Sweep
4
67.8
0.79
0.54
Maternal treatment
1
70.1
0.16
0.69
Paternal treatment
1
65.0
1.34
0.25
Maternal × paternal treatment
1
54.3
0.95
0.34
Number of offspring by territory type
 
PIT-tag reader session#
2
27
0.76
0.48
Territory type+
2
27
10.4
0.0005
Paternal treatment
1
27
8.13
0.0083
  Territory type × paternal treatment 2 27 0.30 0.74

Shown are the effects of parental treatment (monogamy or promiscuous) on the size of all litters, mixed (multiple paternity) litters, and pure (single paternity) litters. Also shown are the effects of paternal treatment and social dominance on number of offspring. GLMM analysis of reproductive success with population as a random effect and all else as fixed effects.

+Territory type: Within-territory, extra-territory or undefended.

*Offspring sweeps were conducted approximately every 35 days to remove and sacrifice pups for genetic analysis (thus preventing them from reaching sexual maturity) (n = 5).

#Transceivers were regularly rotated through the 10 enclosures throughout the competition experiment.