Table 3.
Cross tabulation comparison of all specimens inoculated simultaneously on to both BACTEC and MIGIT media
All casesa |
|
M. bovisb |
|
MOTTc |
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGIT |
MGIT |
MGIT |
|||||||||||
AF+ | Neg | Cont. | Total | AF+ | Neg | Cont. | Total | AF+ | Neg | Cont. | Total | ||
BACTEC |
AF+ |
179 |
33 |
40 |
252 |
136 |
5 |
20 |
161 |
43 |
28 |
20 |
91 |
Neg |
79 |
2217 |
394 |
2690 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
73 |
9 |
3 |
85 |
|
Cont. |
11 |
83 |
132 |
226 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
9 |
0 |
13 |
|
269 | 2333 | 566 | 3168 | 144 | 6 | 22 | 172 | 125 | 37 | 27 | 189 |
a Includes all cases tested using both MGIT 960 media and BACTEC 12B media.
b Includes only cases where M. bovis was recovered, and both MGIT 960 media and BACTEC 12B media were used. There were 3 samples were M. bovis was recovered only on solid media.
c Includes only cases where atypical mycobacteria were recovered, and both MGIT and BACTEC media was used. There were 21 samples where atypical mycobacteria were recovered on solid media only.