Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 26;8(4):e62678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062678

Table 1. Characteristics of participating hospitals.

Non-Screening Hospital (N = 6) Screening Hospital (N = 6) p-value
Hospital Characteristics
Inpatient Days per Month:
Mean 11,842 9,205 0.19
Median 11,437 9,327
Range 7,369–14,627 5,220–12,492
Mean Admissions per Year:
Mean 19,605 18,567 0.61
Median 21,270 18,055
Range 9,882–26,317 13,188–25,875
Mean Number of Beds:
Mean 395 376 0.64
Median 421 382
Range 260–460 227–510
Number of ESBL-E Clinical Isolates 1,357 731 0.02
Number of ESBL-E Bloodstream Infections 175 77 0.06
Number of Positive ESBL-E Rectal Screens N/A 1,887
Infection Control Practices
Contact Precautions for all identified ESBL-E 50.0% (3/6) 66.6% (4/6) 1.0
Private Room 33.3% (2/6) 66.6% (4/6) 0.57
Cohort 83.3% (5/6) 33.3% (2/6) 0.24
Precautions implemented for the duration of admission* 50.0% (3/6) 16.6% (1/6) 0.55
ESBL-E flagged in electronic clinical database 33.3% (2/6) 66.6% (4/6) 0.57
Clinical Isolates Positive for ESBL- Producing Organism
Escherichia coli 80.3% (1,131) 87.4% (639) 0.91
Klebsiella pneumoniae 14.8% (209) 8.1% (59) 0.23
Klebsiella oxytoca 1.2% (17) 4.5% (33) 0.23
Culture Site
Urine 72.6% (985) 75.6% (553) 0.54
Blood 12.9% (175) 10.5% (77) 0.44
Respiratory 6.0% (81) 4.5% (33) 0.41
Wound 4.1% (56) 5.9% (43) 0.27
Abscess 3.3% (45) 1.8% (13) 0.06
Other 1.1% (15) 1.6% (12) 0.58

The remaining hospitals used contact precautions for patients considered at risk of transmission of ESBL (e.g. with diarrhea, incontinence or uncontained wound drainage).

*

The other 3 non-screening hospitals discontinued precautions after 1 negative specimen from the original site (1 hospital) or after 3 negative screening samples each separated by 1 week (2 hospitals). For the other 5 screening hospitals, 3 discontinued after 3 negative screening samples each separated by 1 week and 2 had no written protocols established for discontinuation of precautions.