Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 17;13:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-63

Table 2.

Direction, rate and significance of latitudinal changesin FA proportions in TAGs at high and low growth temperatures

Trait
Directiona
Highb
Lowc
r2d
Slopee
  Highf Low P-value Q-value FDR P-value Q-value FDR High Low High Low
Sat
Decrease
Decrease
0.040
0.056
0.192
0.002
0.007
0.024
0.089
0.191
−0.001
−0.001
16:0
 
 
0.099
0.059
0.203
0.074
0.059
0.203
0.058
0.068
0.000
0.000
18:0
 
 
0.371
0.144
0.495
0.056
0.056
0.192
0.017
0.077
0.000
0.000
18:1
Decrease
 
0.048
0.056
0.192
0.924
0.268
0.924
0.063
0.000
−0.001
0.000
18:2
Increase
 
0.033
0.056
0.192
0.226
0.099
0.341
0.095
0.032
0.001
0.001
18:3
 
 
0.110
0.059
0.203
0.428
0.149
0.513
0.054
0.014
0.001
0.001
20:0
 
 
0.175
0.087
0.300
0.360
0.144
0.495
0.055
0.042
0.000
0.000
20:1
 
 
0.523
0.174
0.598
0.757
0.229
0.790
0.009
0.002
0.000
0.000
20:2
 
 
0.227
0.099
0.341
0.107
0.059
0.203
0.032
0.056
0.000
0.000
20:3
 
 
0.109
0.059
0.203
0.403
0.148
0.509
0.185
0.089
0.000
0.000
22:1
 
Decrease
0.675
0.213
0.736
0.0003
0.002
0.007
0.004
0.251
0.000
−0.001
16:0 + 18:0   Decrease 0.097 0.059 0.203 0.004 0.009 0.032 0.059 0.169 −0.001 −0.001

Numbers in bold indicate significance at α = 0.05.

aDirection of the change in proportions of FAs as latitude increases.

bSignificance of the change in proportions of FAs as latitude increases for the high growing temperature treatment.

cSignificance of the change in proportions of FAs as latitude increasesfor the low growing temperature treatment.

dRegressioncoefficients of the change in proportions of FAs.

eRate of change in proportions of FAs per degree of latitude as latitude increases.

fGrowing temperature.