. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 27.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychol. 2011 Fall;124(3):291–300. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.3.0291

TABLE 2.

Contextual Analysis Results on Serial Position Data for Trials 1, 4, and 5

Variable	M	Total	Unique	Gf	Mem	Speed	Voc
Trial 1 recall
Items 1–3	.71 (.29)	−.26^*	.03	−.08	.46^*	.13^*	−.12^*
Items 4–9	.38 (.22)	−.29^*	.12	−.17^*	.75^*	.13^*	−.23^*
Items 10–12	.62 (.33)	−.01	.15^*	−.06	.22^*	.10	−.04
Trial 4 recall
Items 1–3	.89 (.21)	−.18^*	.06	−.10	.40^*	.10	−.11^*
Items 4–9	.81 (.21)	−.29^*	.18^*	−.10	.72^*	.17^*	−.27^*
Items 10–12	.88 (.22)	−.18^*	.03	−.06	.35^*	.08	−.10
Trial 5 recall
Items 1–3	.81 (.27)	−.22^*	.14^*	−.08	.48^*	.20^*	−.16^*
Items 4–9	.66 (.27)	−.34^*	.11	−.10	.72^*	.15^*	−.25^*
Items 10–12	.61 (.34)	−.32^*	.02	−.13	.66^*	.08	−.21^*

Note. Standard deviations in parentheses. Gf = fluid intelligence; Mem = episodic memory ability; Speed = processing speed; Voc = vocabulary ability

p < .01.