Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 27;14:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-206

Table 1.

Characterization of editing prediction pipeline

A
  # of all m.m. in Alu # of A-to-I in Alu A-to-I ration in all m.m.
STEP2: w/o PSS cutoff
95,187
57,502
60.41%
STEP3: PSS cutoff
8,721
7,266
83.32%
STEP4: in editing box
1,995
1,995
100%
B
 
Alu
Non-Alu repetitive
Non-repetitive
A-to-I
Editing boxes (sites)
238 (1995)
7 (61)
21 (189)
Ave. length (nt)
~108 nt
~86 nt
~71 nt
 
Ave. conversion rate of As to Is
~31%
~40%
~51%
A-to-C
0
0
2 [14]
T-to-G
0
0
1 [6]
A-to-T
0
0
0
T-to-A
0
0
0
C-to-A
0
1 [6]
1 [5]*
G-to-T
0
0
1 [5]
C-to-G
0
0
0
G-to-C
0
0
1 [5]*
C-to-T
0
0
1 [5]
G-to-A
0
0
1 [6]*
C
 
in IR AIu s
within 1 kb to IR AIu s
> 1 kb to IR AIu s
A-to-I editing boxes (sites) 208 (1763) 36 (310) 24 (172)

(A) The enrichment of A-to-I conversion in Alu elements after each step of our computational flow. (B) Editing boxes/sites distribution in Alu, non-Alu repetitive and non-repetitive regions. Asterisk indicated non A-to-Gs (noncanonical editing) sites are validated to be false positives. (C) Editing boxes/sites distribution in IRAlus, within 1 kb to IRAlus and over 1 kb to IRAlus.