. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jan 4;14(5):345–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.11.013

Table 2.

Intervention Implementation Timeline and Results

Targeted Care Area	12-Weeks Baseline % Choice	Intervention Weeks 0–3 (% Choice)	Intervention Weeks 4–6 (% Choice)	Intervention Weeks 7–9 (% Choice)	Intervention Weeks 10–12 (% Choice)
Transfer Out of Bed	21%	Video + Feedback (33%)^*	Feedback Only (34%)^*	Feedback Only (31%)^*	Feedback Only (30%)^*
Incontinence	18%	-----(21%)	Video + Feedback (23%)^*	Feedback Only (25%)^*	Feedback Only (28%)^*
Dressing	20%	-----(26%)^*	-----(30%)^*	Video + Feedback (32%)^*	Feedback Only (29%)^*
Dining Location	8%	-----(9%)	-----(7%)	-----(7%)	Video + Feedback (13%)^*

Shaded Cells indicates the 3-week period during which the intervention targeted the care area and provided both video training and feedback. Subsequent weeks following this period included “feedback only” related to the care area. Cells with “-----“ indicate weeks during which there was neither video training nor feedback provided related to the care area. Percentages calculated by dividing observations in which choice was offered by observations that care was provided with no choice + observations in which no care or conversation about care occurred.

Significant difference from baseline to each 3-week Intervention period based on paired-samples t tests (All P < .01).