Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar 16;65(6):602–609. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.016

Table 1.

Association of reported methodological quality and sample size (publication data only)

Assessment of reported methodological quality parameters N (%) Median sample size (range) Kruskal-Wallis test P-value
Allocation concealment 0.09

Adequate 101 (24) 215 (26–1387)
Inadequate 328 (76) 242 (30–18882)

Generation randomization sequence

Adequate 98 (23) 262 (40–18882)
Inadequate 331 (77) 236 (26–3561)

Blinding procedures 0.05

Adequate 15 (43) 234 (47–1387)
Inadequate 20 (57) 123 (45–18882)

Description of drop outs 0.56

Adequate 418 (97) 241 (26–18882)
Inadequate 8 (3) 192 (47–1695)

Intention to treat analysis 0.16

Done and reported 392 (91) 352 (86–18882)
Not done and not reported 36 (9) 216 (43–724)

Pre specification of α error 0.14

Yes 138 (32) 252 (30–18882)
No 290 (68) 237 (26–2233)

Pre specification of β error 0.23

Yes 174 (41) 244 (30–18882)
No 254 (59) 236 (26–3561)

Choice of the comparator < 0.001

Active Treatment 351 (82) 245 (26–18882)
Placebo 30 (7) 132 (45–1387)
Active Treatment + Placebo 3 (1) 260 (64–266)
No Treatment 45 (10) 242 (30–4406)