Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 May 12;152(1):133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.023

TABLE 4.

Association of Binocular Summation Score, Disease Status, Age, and Interocular Difference in Multiple Sclerosis Patients for High-Contrast Visual Acuity and Low-Contrast Letter Acuity

Measure, Variable Coefficient From Linear
Regression Modela
P Value
All patients (N = 1331)
 Visual acuity (high-contrast)
  MS vs control −0.09 .6
  Age, years −0.01 .66
 Low-contrast, 2.5%
  MS vs control 0.02 .9
  Age, years −0.07 <.0001a
 Low-contrast, 1.25%
  MS vs control 0.04 .9
  Age, years −0.09 <.0001a
MS patients only (N = 1007)
 Visual acuity (high-contrast)
  ON vs no ON −0.08 .7
  Age, years −0.01 .2
 Low-contrast, 2.5%
  ON vs no ON −0.05 .2
  Age, years −0.07 <.0001a
 Low-contrast, 1.25%
  ON vs no ON −1.72 <.0001a
  Age, years −0.11 <.0001a
MS patients only (N = 1007)
 Visual acuity (high-contrast)
  ON vs no ON 0.01 .78
  Age, years −0.01 .29
  Interocular difference, letters −0.20 .32
 Low-contrast, 2.5%
  ON vs no ON 0.70 .8
  Age, years −0.07 <.0001a
  Interocular difference, letters −0.14 <.0001a
 Low-contrast, 1.25%
  ON vs no ON −1.0 .015a
  Age, years −0.12 <.0001a
  Interocular difference, letters −0.25 <.0001a

MS = multiple sclerosis; ON = history of optic neuritis.

a

Linear regression models were used to examine the relation between binocular summation and various patient characteristics.