Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Nov 20;89(4):330–332. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050693

Table 1.

Recurring sexual partner concurrency among female sex workers and their non-commercial male partners in Tijuana and Cd. Juárez, Mexico (n=428)

With past-
year
recurring
concurrency
(n=68, 16%)
Without
past-year
recurring
concurrency
(n=360, 84%)
Overall
(n=428,
100%)
FSWs’
Concurrency:
Marginal
Effect
(robust SE) a
(n=214)
Men’s
Concurrency:
Marginal
Effect
(robust SE) a
(n=214)
Socio-Demographics & Relationship Factors
Female (vs. male) 55
(81%)
159
(44%)
214
(50%)
-- --
Age in years (median,
IQR b)
33
(28–41)
35
(29–42)
35
(29–42)
-- --
Educational attainment
in years (median, IQR)
7
(6–9)
6
(6–9)
7
(6–9)
-- --
Income ≥$250 USD per
month
52
(76%)
190
(53%)
242
(57%)
0.26***
(0.06)
−0.01
(0.03)
Non-commercial
relationship duration in
years (median, IQR) c
3
(2–7)
3
(2–5)
3
(2–6)
-- --
Unprotected vaginal sex
acts w/ study partner,
past month (median %,
IQR) c
100%
(65–100)
100%
(83–100)
100%
(80–100)
-- --
Believes study partner
has had STIs
11
(16%)
22
(6%)
33
(8%)
0.09
(0.09)
0.09**
(0.04)
Machismo score (range
10–40; median, IQR) d
20
(18–22)
20
(17–23)
20
(17–23)
-- --
Caballerismo score
(range 10–40; median,
IQR) d
30
(20–30)
30
(28–37)
30
(28–36)
−0.01
(0.04)
0.04**
(0.02)
Heroin use (past 6
months)
34
(50%)
233
(65%)
267
(62%)
-- --
Cocaine use (past 6
months)
13
(19%)
72
(20%)
85
(20%)
-- --
Crack use (past 6
months)
4
(6%)
55
(15%)
59
(14%)
-- --
Methamphetamine use
(past 6 months)
39
(57%)
95
(26%)
134
(31%)
-- --
Injected any drugs (past
6 months)
31
(46%)
225
(63%)
256
(60%)
-- --
a

Marginal effects were calculated from the final, adjusted bivariate probit regression model with robust standard errors (SE) controlling for city and couple-specific effects (Rho statistic indicated significant correlation of error terms within couples, p<.001).

b

Interquartile range.

c

Dyad average (uses information from both partners’ responses within a given couple).

d

Subscale of the Traditional Machismo and Caballerismo Scale.[9]

*

p<.10,

**

p<.05,

***

p<.01.