Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;140(7):803–813. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012002259

Table 3.

Studies on the relationship between host group size and parasite species richness included in the meta-analyses

Host/parasite system Reference Host mobility Transmission mode n r
Hoofed mammal/arthropod Ezenwa et al. (2006) M D 64 −0·32
Hoofed mammal/helminth Ezenwa et al. (2006) M I 64 −0·33
Hoofed mammal/microparasite Ezenwa et al. (2006) M 64 −0·08
Primate/protozoan Freeland (1979) M I 11 0·91
Birds/cestode Gregory et al. (1991) M I 86 −0·1
Birds/nematode Gregory et al. (1991) M I 84 0·2
Birds/trematode Gregory et al. (1991) M I 83 −0·06
Teleost fish/metazoan Luque et al. (2004) M 8 0·0491
Cyprinidae/ectoparasites Poulin (1991a) M D 33 −0·21
Cyprinidae/endoparasites Poulin (1991a) M I 33 0·062
Percidae/ectoparasites Poulin (1991a) M D 10 −0·174
Percidae/endoparasites Poulin (1991a) M I 10 0·77
Salmonoid/ectoparasites Poulin (1991a) M D 17 0·455
Salmonoid/endoparasites Poulin (1991a) M I 17 0·435
Cyprinidae/mobile parasites Poulin (1991a) M M 33 −0·106
Percidae/mobile parasites Poulin (1991a) M M 10 −0·073
Salmonoid/mobile parasites Poulin (1991a) M M 17 0·314

(Presented here, with number of groups examined (n), the correlation coefficient (r), host mobility (M = mobile), transmission mode (I = indirect, D = direct, M = mobile))