Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Rural Remote Health. 2011 Jan 28;11(1):1617.

Table 1.

Bivariate comparisons by degree of rurality - Central Pennsylvania Women’s Health Study, 2004–2005

Variable Locality n (%) P-value
Urban area Large rural area Small or
isolated rural
area
Total 1225 (61) 442 (22) 326 (16)
Demographics (Predisposing)
  Age (years)
    18–24 201 (16) 53 (12) 38 (12) 0.004
    25–34 457 (37) 144 (33) 132 (40)
    35–45 565 (46) 243 (55) 156 (48)
  White, non-Hispanic 1035 (85) 423 (96) 318 (98) <.001
  Greater than high school education 769 (63) 245 (55) 178 (55) 0.003
Healthcare access (Enabling)
  Regular healthcare provider 1079 (88) 398 (90) 299 (92) 0.121
  Sees any OBGYN 861 (72) 286 (67) 216 (68) 0.058
  Poverty status
    Poverty/near poverty 329 (27) 116 (26) 10 (34) 0.104
    Not poverty 719 (59) 266 (60) 169 (52)
    Missing poverty 177 (14) 60 (14) 47 (14)
  Continuous health insurance coverage (12-months) 1013 (83) 366 (83) 255 (78) 0.141
Health behaviors and indicators (Need)
  Smokes 295 (24) 129 (29) 83 (25) 0.110
  Binge drinking/drug use 211 (17) 58 (13) 37 (11) 0.010
  Obesity 301 (25) 101 (23) 90 (28) 0.324
Preventive counseling services received
  Smoking 392 (32) 162 (37) 91 (28) 0.035
  Alcohol/drug use 161 (13) 48 (11) 28 (9) 0.059
  Birth control 441 (36) 141 (32) 93 (29) 0.025
  Nutrition 489 (40) 143 (32) 112 (34) 0.009
  Weight management 344 (28) 110 (25) 85 (26) 0.393
  Physical activity 462 (38) 134 (30) 103 (32) 0.007

OBGYN, obstetrician-gynecologist.

Rurality information was unavailable on nine women.