Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Soc Behav. 2012;53(2):263–275. doi: 10.1177/0022146512445898

Table 1.

Variable Means for Full Sample and by Union Status 2002–2005, Mexican Family Life Survey (MxFLS)

All Union Transitions 2002–2005
Stable Union Status 2002–2005
Entered Union Dissolved Union Single Cohabiting Married Divorced/Separated Widow



N = 11,339 n = 435 n = 188 n = 2,338 n = 1,088 n = 6,208 n = 560 n = 522
Percentage of sample by union statusa 100 4 2 21 10 55 5 5
Dependent variable
 Change in body mass index (BMI) .23 1.78 −.05 .68 .37 .003 .20 −.53
Baseline controls
 Age 39.58 22.62 42.68 24.16 38.46 44.04 45.65 64.05
 Male .40 .45 .26 .45 .40 .42 .23 .22
 Normal BMIb .37 .65 .30 .62 .33 .27 .33 .32
 Total children 2.57 .32 3.43 .12 3.00 3.26 3.44 5.07
 Less than elementary education .38 .11 .39 .13 .42 .44 .45 .77
 Some secondary education .25 .26 .22 .25 .28 .25 .25 .17
 High school degree .31 .51 .36 .52 .27 .26 .25 .05
 Some college + .06 .12 .03 .10 .03 .05 .05 .01
 Indigenous .14 .12 .14 .11 .14 .15 .10 .16
 Logged per capita household income 5.39 5.65 5.25 5.55 5.07 5.42 5.42 4.78
Controls 2002–2005
 Moved to urban area .03 .05 .01 .03 .03 .04 .02 .04
 Change in number of children .22 .65 .60 .07 .32 .22 .11 .25
 Change in work status −.02 −.07 .15 .07 −.04 −.04 −.09 −.09
 Change in house-hold size .30 −.37 .32 .31 .35 .33 .35 .29
 Change in household income −.19 .16 −.40 .08 −.02 −.26 −.48 −.74
a

Percentages across union categories do not add to 100 percent due to rounding.

b

Means significantly different: Entering union and single stable more likely to be normal weight and have higher mean change in BMI than rest of sample. Dissolved union, stable married, stable cohabiting, and stable divorced/separated/widowed less likely to be normal weight and have lower mean change in BMI than rest of sample.