Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012 Jul 1;6(3):1099–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2012.03.001

Table 3.

Fully adjusted models using AD, EF task, and AD-by-EF task interaction terms as predictors of frequency and duration of stereotypy.

Frequency
Duration
b SE B β p-Value b SE B β p-Value
Model 1
Block 1
 WCST Categories −0.25 0.22 −.19 .251 −1.15 0.61 −.26 .066
 AD diagnosis 1.55 0.90 .32 .059 5.88 2.27 .35 .013
Block 2
 AD × WCST Categories −1.06 0.41 −.48 .013 −3.51 1.17 −.48 .004
Model 2
Block 1
 WISC-R Mazes −0.24 0.11 −.34 .030 −0.99 0.37 −.41 .010
 AD diagnosis 1.67 0.75 .32 .032 6.66 2.54 .37 .012
Block 2
 AD × WISC-R Mazes −0.22 0.23 −.26 .356 −1.56 .75 −.55 .046
Model 3
Block 1
 SB-IV Matrices −0.08 0.06 −.21 .189 −0.34 0.20 −.26 .099
 AD diagnosis 1.70 0.78 .32 .036 6.77 2.69 .38 .016
Block 2
 AD × SB-IV Matrices −0.29 0.10 −.47 .006 −1.24 0.32 −.59 <.001

Note: AD, Autistic Disorder; DLD, Developmental Language Disorder. Analysis adjusted for age, gender, and parent education.