Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;6:91. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-91

Table 2.

Influence of sampling method on the proportion of fed An. quadriannulatus and An. funestus which were captureda

Sampling method Percentage (Proportion fed) ORb [95% C.I] P value
Anopheles quadriannulatus
 
 
 
HLC indoor
24.4 (99/405)
1.00c
NAd
HLC outdoor
29.3 (71/242)
1.900 [1.253, 2.881]
0.003
CDC light trap
12.9 (101/784)
0.417 [0.292, 0.596]
< 0.001
Ifakara tent trap – C
28.6 (6/21)
1.251 [0.430, 3.642]
0.682
Window exit traps
(0/1)
NEe
NEe
Resting boxes indoor
(0/0)
NEe
NEe
Resting boxes outdoor
100 (2/2)
NEe
NEe
Anopheles funestus
 
 
 
HLC indoor
34.8 (608/1749)
1.00c
NAd
HLC outdoor
37.2 (608/1635)
1.188 [1.017, 1.387]
0.030
CDC light trap
20.6 (541/2630)
0.543 [0.467, 0.633]
< 0.001
Ifakara tent trap – C
14.1 (199/1410)
0.261 [0.215, 0.317]
< 0.001
Window exit trap
38.0 (27/71)
1.086 [0.643, 1.835]
0.758
Resting boxes indoor
73.7 (28/38)
4.486 [2.059, 9.776]
< 0.001
Resting boxes outdoor 72.7 (80/110) 5.899 [3.688, 9.434] < 0.001

a As described in the methods section, village, season and treatment were all included as fixed effects, while household and date were included as random effects. The proportions of fed An. quadriannulatus and An. funestus were not affected by village, season and treatment (P > 0.05).

b Odds Ratio represents the relative probability of sampled mosquitoes which had fed compared to the reference indoor HLC method.

c Reference method.

d Not applicable.

e Not estimable due to small or no numbers observed or no mosquito catches.