Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 7;14:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-11

Table 8.

The trial with the cohort subgroup with Schatzker V-VI type of fractures compared with the literature

  Present study Yu et al. 2009 Catagni et al. 2007 Lee et al. 2007 Phisitkul et al. 2007 Boldin et al. 2006 Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society 2006 Oh et al. 2006 Egol et al. 2005 El-Barbary et al. 2005 Cole et al. 2004 Ricci et al. 2004 Dendrinos et al. 1996 Zecher et al. 1996 Yang et al. 1995 Marsh et al. 1995
Study design
P
P
R
R
R
P
Rand
P
P
R
R
P
P
P
P/R
P
Number of patients
19
54
59
35
37
25
82
23
53
29
87
28
24
21
22/22
20
High-Energy
14
54
59
35
37
18
NM
NM
53
29
75
NM
24
21
40
20
Time to definitive surgery (days)
2
10
NM
12
13
6
4
11
9
NM
7
NM
2
NM
NM
2
Intervention
CEF
ORIF
CEF + IF
ORIF
ORIF
ORIF
40 ORIF/42 CEF
ORIF
ORIF
CEF + IF
ORIF
ORIF
CEF + IF
CEF + IF
ORIF + cast/CEF + IF
Unilat + IF
Full weight-bearing (weeks)
immediate
19
immediate in 40 patients with femoral extension
12
16 patients: 11
NM
NM
14
12
6
13
Extra-articular fractures: 6–8
14
NM
12/08/12
4-8
19 patients: 15
Intra-articular fractures: 8-12
Follow-up (months)
12
24
21
3-26
49
36
24
25
16
27
14
23
37
14
21–208
38
Knee ROM ° injured side
0-120
0-108
0-119
0-135
0-112
0-117
0-120 No differences
0-123
0-106
0-112
0-120
NM
90% >110
>90
 
0-130
Healing (weeks)
12
15
29
16
12
11
NM
19
NM
NM
13
NM
14
0
16/20
15
Compartment syndrome
2
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
10
0
0
4
3
7
0
0
Deep Vein Thrombosis
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
0
Deep infection
0
2
0
2
8
0
18% ORIF
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
5/1
9
Reoperations
TKR: 2
TKR: 2
0
Irrigation + drainage: 2
Staged protocol in 28 fractures with cast, EF and later ORIF
TKR: 2
Removal of EF: 27
 
Staged protocol for all patients with knee spanning fixation and later ORIF
NM
Quadricepsplasty: 2
Stage protocol with EF before ORIF: 2
Fasciotomy: 3
Revision with ORIF: 2
Soft-tissue flap: 8/1
Arthrotomy + drainage: 2
Knee manipulation: 2
Plate removal: 2
Soft tissue flap: 2
Irrigation + drainage: 8
Fasciotomy: 1
Total 37/16
Soft tissue flaps: 4
 
Loss of fixation: 2
TKR:1
Revision of fixator: 3
Fasciotomy: 2 Arthroscopy: 1
Plate removal: 6
Bone graft: 1
TKR: 2/1
 
Plate removal: 4
 
Irrigation + drainage: 5
Fasciotomy: 2
Amputation: 1
 
Knee manipula- tion: 3/2
 
Incision + drainage: 1
 
Bone graft: 1
Plate removal: 1
Fasciotomy: 3
 
Incision + drainage: 8/2
 
Bone graft: 2
 
Amputation: 1
Skin graft: 1
Skin graft: 5/2
 
Quadricepsplasty: 1
 
Change of implant: 3
Screw removal: 0/6
 
Knee mani- pulation + arthroscopy: 2
 
Plate removal: 10
Plate removal: 8/0
 
 
 
 
Amputation: 1/0
Soft-tissue flap: 4/0
Other: 6/3
Functional outcome
VAS Pain
HSS score
ASAMI score
0
0
HSS score
SF-36 WOMAC HSS knees
Rasmussen score
WOMAC
Knee Society score
0
Lower Extremity Measure
Honkonen score
 
0
SF-36
VAS Satisfaction
Lysholm score
Knee Society score
Iowa
NHP
Knee Society scoer
Knee score
EQ5-D
 
  KOOS  

P = Prospective, R = Retrospective, Rand = Randomiserade, NM = Not mentioned, CEF = Circular External Fixator, IF = Internal Fixation,

ORIF = Open Reduction and Internal Fixation, Unilat = Unilateral Extern Fixation, TKR = Total Knee Replacement, ROM = Range of Motion.