Table 2.
Summary of AIC modelling of Plasmodium relictum infection in great tits
| Parameters* | Deviance | AICc | ΔAICc | ω | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 |
1+2+9 |
267.23 |
277.47 |
0 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 2 |
1+2+4+8+9 |
263.20 |
277.66 |
0.19 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 3 |
1+2+8+9 |
265.40 |
277.74 |
0.27 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 4 |
1+2+4+9 |
265.40 |
277.74 |
0.27 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 5 |
1+2+4+8 |
265.61 |
277.95 |
0.48 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 6 |
2+4+8 |
268.04 |
278.28 |
0.81 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 7 |
2+4+8+9 |
266.06 |
278.4 |
0.93 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 8 |
1+2+8 |
268.17 |
278.41 |
0.94 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 9 |
1+2+4 |
268.25 |
278.49 |
1.02 |
0.01 |
|
| Model 10 |
1+2+5+9 |
266.17 |
278.51 |
1.04 |
0.01 |
|
| Null model |
Intercept |
276.01 |
280.06 |
2.59 |
0.00 |
|
| * see code below for which parameters that are included |
|
|
|
|||
| Averaged model parameters: |
|
|
|
|
||
| Parameters |
Code |
Coeff. |
SE |
Low CI |
Upp CI |
Rel. import. |
| (Intercept) |
|
2.49 |
3.14 |
-3.66 |
8.65 |
|
| Age(young) |
1 |
-0.40 |
0.39 |
-1.16 |
0.35 |
0.69 |
| Cs |
2 |
-0.13 |
0.13 |
-0.37 |
0.12 |
0.68 |
| D(low) |
3 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
-0.23 |
0.23 |
0.12 |
| Spring date |
4 |
-0.04 |
0.05 |
-0.13 |
0.06 |
0.52 |
| GSSG |
5 |
0.04 |
0.11 |
-0.17 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
| Mass |
6 |
-0.04 |
0.12 |
-0.28 |
0.19 |
0.26 |
| Q(low) |
7 |
0.00 |
0.15 |
-0.29 |
0.29 |
0.13 |
| ROM |
8 |
-0.13 |
0.18 |
-0.49 |
0.23 |
0.54 |
| Sex(male) |
9 |
-0.28 |
0.35 |
-0.97 |
0.40 |
0.56 |
| tGSH | 10 | 0.04 | 0.10 | -0.17 | 0.24 | 0.26 |
The top ten models are presented along with relative parameter importance (based on a model average with Δ AICc > 4).
cs clutch size, D breeding density, GSSG oxidized glutathione, Q habitat quality, ROM reactive oxygen metabolites, tGSH total glutathione, Rel. imp relative parameters importance, CI confidence interval (lower and upper), ω model weight.