Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;84(2):145–152. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.784660

Table 3.

All-cause, aseptic, and septic revision rates per 100 observation years, and reasons for revision, listed according to type of highly crosslinked polyethylene (all on cobalt-chromium alloy) a

Total CoCr-HXLPE CoCr-Durasul CoCr-Prolong CoCr-Sigma XLK CoCr-Other HXLPE
(n = 7,618) (n = 557) (n = 5,132) (n = 1,481) (n = 448)
All-cause revisions, n b 157 20 115 18 4
 Total observation years 16,478 1,908 11,713 2,431 427
 Revisions per 100 obs. years, % (95% CI) 0.95 (0.81–1.11) 1.05 (0.68–1.62) 0.98 (0.82–1.18) 0.74 (0.47–1.18) 0.94 (0.35–2.50)
Aseptic revision, n c 86 13 66 4 3
 Total observation years 16,478 1,908 11,713 2,431 427
 Revisions per 100 obs. years, % (95% CI) 0.52 (0.42–0.64) 0.68 (0.40–1.17) 0.56 (0.44–0.72) 0.16 (0.06–0.44) 0.70 (0.23–2.18)
Septic revision, n d 71 7 49 14 1
 Total observation years 16,478 1,908 11,713 2,431 257
 Revisions per 100 obs. years, % (95% CI) 0.43 (0.34–0.54) 0.37 (0.17–0.77) 0.42 (0.32–0.55) 0.58 (0.34–0.97) 0.39 (0.05–2.76)
Reasons for revision e
 Infection 71 (45.2) 7 (35.0) 36 (39.6) 14 (77.8) 1 (25.0)
 Instability 43 (27.4) 3 (15.0) 39 (33.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (25.0)
 Pain 25 (15.9) 3 (15.0) 19 (16.5) 3 (16.7) 0 (0.0)
 Arthrofibrosis 15 (9.6) 4 (20.0) 9 (7.8) 1 (5.6) 1 (25.0)
 Aseptic loosening 11 (7.0) 2 (10.0) 6 (5.2) 2 (11.1) 1 (25.0)
 Wound drainage 3 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 3 (2.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Femoral fracture 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Ingrowth failure 2 (1.3) 2 (10.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Patello-femoral joint malfunction 2 (1.3) 1 (5.0) 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Synovial impingement 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Hematoma 1 (0.6) 1 (5.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Failed extensor mechanism 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Polyethylene liner wear 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Other 9 (5.7) 1 (5.0) 7 (6.1) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0)

a Comparison of revision rate per 100 observation years was analyzed using Poisson regression with exact tests. No adjustments were made for confounders.

b Overall comparison of all-cause revision per 100 observation years across groups, p = 0.7. No contrasts were performed because the overall test was not significant.

c Overall comparison of aseptic revision per 100 observation years across groups, p = 0.02. Contrasts: CoCr-Durasul vs. CoCr-Prolong, p = 0.6; CoCr-Other HXLPE vs. CoCr-Prolong, p = 0.9; CoCr-Sigma XLK vs. CoCr-Prolong, p = 0.009.

d Overall comparison of septic revision per 100 observation years across groups, p = 0.7. No contrasts were performed because the overall test was not significant.

e Number (%), reasons for revision (except for infection) are not mutually exclusive.

For other abbreviations, see Table 1.