Table 2. Comparison between the theoretical biological variation and the intra-individual variations recorded in the study cohorts.
2010 (subjects exceding CVBw) | 2012 (subjects exceding CVBw) | ||||||
CVBw (%) | T2vsT1 | T3vsT2 | T3vsT1 | T2vsT1 | T3vsT2 | T3vsT1 | |
(n = 144) | (n = 144) | (n = 144) | (n = 109) | (n = 109) | (n = 109) | ||
WBC | 11.2 | 61 | 95 | 92 | 55 | 58 | 71 |
RBC | 2.1 | 141 | 126 | 112 | 104 | 83 | 92 |
Hb | 3.4 | 136 | 118 | 81 | 95 | 56 | 77 |
Ht | 2.4 | 134 | 137 | 87 | 106 | 81 | 81 |
MCV | 1.3 | 60 | 44 | 104 | 28 | 16 | 36 |
MCH | 1.6 | 21 | 40 | 38 | 26 | 19 | 18 |
MCHC | 1.7 | 46 | 128 | 140 | 25 | 28 | 38 |
PLT | 9.0 | 67 | 63 | 59 | 70 | 72 | 76 |
Ret% | 13.0 | 93 | 106 | 92 | 75 | 80 | 67 |
Ret# | 13.0 | 98 | 117 | 93 | 80 | 89 | 72 |
The table shows the theoretical intra-individual variability values (CVBw) and the number of subjects (out of 144 for the 2010 race and 109 for the 2012 race) for each GiroBio race event, whose percentage variation between time-points exceeded the theoretical CVBw.