Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e63092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063092

Table 2. Comparison between the theoretical biological variation and the intra-individual variations recorded in the study cohorts.

2010 (subjects exceding CVBw) 2012 (subjects exceding CVBw)
CVBw (%) T2vsT1 T3vsT2 T3vsT1 T2vsT1 T3vsT2 T3vsT1
(n = 144) (n = 144) (n = 144) (n = 109) (n = 109) (n = 109)
WBC 11.2 61 95 92 55 58 71
RBC 2.1 141 126 112 104 83 92
Hb 3.4 136 118 81 95 56 77
Ht 2.4 134 137 87 106 81 81
MCV 1.3 60 44 104 28 16 36
MCH 1.6 21 40 38 26 19 18
MCHC 1.7 46 128 140 25 28 38
PLT 9.0 67 63 59 70 72 76
Ret% 13.0 93 106 92 75 80 67
Ret# 13.0 98 117 93 80 89 72

The table shows the theoretical intra-individual variability values (CVBw) and the number of subjects (out of 144 for the 2010 race and 109 for the 2012 race) for each GiroBio race event, whose percentage variation between time-points exceeded the theoretical CVBw.