Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e61546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061546

Table 5. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) among Corallium rubrum populations using microsatellites, mtMSH and MtC data sets.

Microsatellites mtMSH MtC
Source of variation d.f Variance components % d.f Variance components % d.f Variance components %
(A) Sampling sites
Among groups 2 0.132 4.34 2 0.014 23.65 2 0.594 56.78
Among samples within groups 3 0.320 10.49** 3 0.000 −0.64** 3 −0.003 −0.30
Within samples 264 2.597 85.17** 129 0.047 76.99** 129 0.455 43.52**
(B) Areas
Among groups 1 0.153 4.96 1 −0.001 −2.27 1 0.828 63.60
Among samples within groups 4 0.342 11.05** 4 0.012 20.58* 4 0.019 1.44
Within samples 264 2.597 83.99** 129 0.050 81.69** 129 0.455 34.96**

Red coral populations were grouped according to (A) their sampling site (three groups: Elba, Ischia and Praiano) and (B) the areas (two groups: NTS and STS). * P<0.05, ** P<0.001.