Table 5. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) among Corallium rubrum populations using microsatellites, mtMSH and MtC data sets.
Microsatellites | mtMSH | MtC | ||||||||
Source of variation | d.f | Variance components | % | d.f | Variance components | % | d.f | Variance components | % | |
(A) | Sampling sites | |||||||||
Among groups | 2 | 0.132 | 4.34 | 2 | 0.014 | 23.65 | 2 | 0.594 | 56.78 | |
Among samples within groups | 3 | 0.320 | 10.49** | 3 | 0.000 | −0.64** | 3 | −0.003 | −0.30 | |
Within samples | 264 | 2.597 | 85.17** | 129 | 0.047 | 76.99** | 129 | 0.455 | 43.52** | |
(B) | Areas | |||||||||
Among groups | 1 | 0.153 | 4.96 | 1 | −0.001 | −2.27 | 1 | 0.828 | 63.60 | |
Among samples within groups | 4 | 0.342 | 11.05** | 4 | 0.012 | 20.58* | 4 | 0.019 | 1.44 | |
Within samples | 264 | 2.597 | 83.99** | 129 | 0.050 | 81.69** | 129 | 0.455 | 34.96** |
Red coral populations were grouped according to (A) their sampling site (three groups: Elba, Ischia and Praiano) and (B) the areas (two groups: NTS and STS). * P<0.05, ** P<0.001.