. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 23.

Published in final edited form as: Langmuir. 2013 Apr 8;29(16):5037–5049. doi: 10.1021/la3050016

Table 1.

Comparison of pseudo second order kinetic parameters for 100% CEL, 100% CS, 50:50 CEL:β-TCD and 50:50 CS:β-TCD composite material.

	100% CEL				100% CS				50:50 CEL:β-TCD				50:50 CS:β-TCD

Analyte	q_e(M/g)	K₂ (M⁻¹ min⁻¹)	R²	MSC	q_e(M/g) K₂	(M⁻¹ min⁻¹)	R²	MSC	q_e(M/g)	K₂ (M⁻¹ min⁻¹)	R²	MSC	q_e(M/g)	K₂ (M⁻¹ min⁻¹)	R²	MSC
2-ClPh	3.93E-04	702.3	0.9871	3.95	1.32E-03	385.9	0.9998	8.02	1.30E-03	100.2	0.9975	5.57	7.58E-04	268.4	0.9967	5.32
3-ClPh	3.20E-04	293.8	0.9822	3.72	1.68E-03	133.5	0.9960	5.21	9.87E-04	77.9	0.9964	5.33	1.25E-03	118.6	0.9934	4.71
4-ClPh	5.81E-04	2054.2	0.9999	9.13	1.66E-03	214.6	0.9996	7.52	1.41E-03	58.0	0.9993	6.93	8.99E-04	313.1	0.9957	5.11
3,4 Di-ClPh	8.19E-04	315.6	0.9996	7.47	2.27E-03	169.8	0.9999	8.72	9.12E-04	160.6	0.9992	6.84	1.99E-03	57.1	0.9978	5.77
2,4,5 Tri-ClPh	1.95E-03	25.4	0.9967	5.32	1.20E-02	2.1	0.9991	6.60	2.00E-03	33.2	0.9995	7.26	8.84E-03	2.1	0.9996	7.41
BPA	8.05E-04	78.9	0.9911	4.39	1.80E-03	168.3	0.9995	7.24	1.34E-03	65.5	0.9987	6.28	1.59E-03	37.6	0.9994	7.11