Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2011 Oct 12;81(4):401–406. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.354

Table 2.

Comparison of Patients with Different Levels of Interstitial Inflammation

Demographic/Clinical Feature/Biomarker Level No-Mild Inflammation Moderate-Severe Inflammation
Caucasian (%) 25 (53) 4 (24)
African American (%) 16 (34) 11 (64)1
Other (%) 6 (13) 2 (12)1
Age 30±1.1 32±2.1
Mean SCr2 (mg/dl) 1.09±0.10 2.61±0.37
Mean uPCR3 2.80±0.42 5.33±1.234
Class II (%) 6 (13%) 0
Class III, III+V (%) 11 (23%) 4 (23.5%)
Class IV, IV+V (%) 25 (53%) 12 (70.5%)
Class V (%) 5 (11%) 1 (6%)
uMCP-1 (ng/mg Cr) 1.22±0.15 5.21±1.185
uHepcidin (ng/mg Cr) 235±55 658±2296
uLFABP (ng/mg Cr) 71±10 152±317
1

African American plus other races/ethnicities were significantly over-represented in the moderate-severe interstitial inflammation group (P=0.048, Fisher’s exact test)

1

Serum creatinine ±SEM

2

Urine protein creatinine ratio

4

P<0.0001 vs no-mild inflammation (Mann-Whitney test)

5

Biomarker Levels are mean±SEM; P<0.0001 vs no-mild inflammation (Mann-Whitney test)

6

P<0.003 vs no-mild inflammation (Mann-Whitney test)

7

P<0.002 vs no-mild inflammation (Mann-Whitney test)