Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2012 Oct 30;11(12):5592–5601. doi: 10.1021/pr300796m

Table 1.

Topics for developing a 5-10 year biospecimen plan for proteomics

Assessing Current Status Recommendations for the next 5–10 years

What are the relative numbers for different biobank types?
  1. Individual

  2. Specific project

  3. Grant program

  4. Public repository

What would be the ideal balance?
  1. Individual

  2. Specific project

  3. Grant program

  4. Public repository

How well utilized are each of these different types? Are there other types of biobanks that should be
recommended?
What characteristics contribute to the successful biobanks?
What characteristics limit use of others? Can we develop a rapid, on-demand approach to biobanks?
From past experience, what should we avoid?
What should we include?

What is the current proportion of cohort vs. case/control
collections?
What is the ideal proportion of cohort vs. case/control
collections?
What is the relative investment in cohort vs. case/control
collection?
What is the ideal relative investment that should be made?
Which cohorts have been used efficiently? For longitudinal studies, what are the overall time horizon
and sampling frequency needs?
Which case/control collections have been used efficiently? Are there important cohorts, currently not collected, that
should be collected?
Which characteristics have led to successful use of
case/control collections?
Which diseases should be represented in the case/control
collections?
What time horizons have been necessary for successful
longitudinal studies?
How can we better ensure that researchers know where to
look to find specimens?
What are the burdens and advantages of different sampling
frequencies in longitudinal studies?

How do researchers access samples in the current biobanks? What are the best ways to govern future biobanks?
Are there defined processes in place? What are the best ways to manage access to samples?
Are they efficient? How do we balance broad access to samples with the need to
preserve precious resources?
Which processes work well, which poorly?

Assess the samples currently available
  1. Which samples are available?

    1. Blood

    2. Serum

    3. Tissue – which ones?

    4. Other

  2. How have they been processed?

    1. Nucleic acid

    2. Protein

    3. Staining for microscopy

    4. Frozen

    5. Other

  3. Were they collected and processed using SOPs?

  4. Are their SOPs documented?

  5. What types of control samples are available?

  6. What types of storage are used?

Defining the sample needs
  1. Which types of samples are needed?

    1. Blood

    2. Serum

    3. Tissue – which ones?

    4. Other

  2. What kind of processing is needed?

    1. Nucleic acid

    2. Protein

    3. Staining for microscopy

    4. Frozen

    5. Other

  3. Which processing SOPs are recommended?

  4. Which control samples are needed?

  5. Ideal storage conditions?


Defining the annotation needs for future samples
  1. Clinical annotation – What is ideal? What is practical?

  2. Processing history

  3. Informed consent and usage guidelines

  4. Ability to capture follow up data

  5. Other

Defining the annotation needs for future samples
  1. Clinical annotation – What is ideal? What is practical?

  2. Processing history

  3. Informed consent and usage guidelines

  4. Ability to capture follow up data

  5. Other


Which biobanks work with commercial entities? How should future biobanks work with commercial entities?
Which aspects have been successful and unsuccessful? How should this be balanced?