Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Violence. 2012 Sep 23;27(8):801–811. doi: 10.1007/s10896-012-9471-z

Table 2.

Percentages (or Means and Standard Deviations) of Variables by Age Group for Those with a Partner in the Past Year, n = 495

Age Group
All (n = 495) p
18–39 (n = 165) 40–54 (n = 224) 55+ (n = 106)
Violence in the Past Year
 Physical Assault 1.8% 1.8% 2.9% 2.0% 0.793
 Psychological Aggression 34.5% 26.3% 18.3% 27.4% 0.013
 Sexual Coercion 19.6% 20.5% 6.7% 17.3% 0.005
 Injury 0.6% 1.8% 1.0% 1.2% 0.556
Marital Power Structure
 Male Dominant 11.0% 23.9% 24.8% 20.0% 0.005
 Female Dominant 9.7% 2.8% 3.0% 5.0% 0.007
 Divided 7.6% 6.0% 11.9% 7.8% 0.184
 Equalitarian 71.7% 67.4% 60.4% 67.2% 0.176
Employed, Full/Part Time 31.5% 48.2% 26.4% 38.0% <.001
Partner Drinks Weekly 34.7% 38.4% 19.2% 33.1% 0.002
Partner Has Drinking Problem 1.3% 5.8% 3.8% 3.9% 0.088

18–39 (n = 165) 40–54 (n = 224) 55+ (n = 106) All (n = 495)
M SD M SD M SD M SD p

Education, Years in Korea & U.S. 15.8 3.0 15.5 2.4 13.9 4.0 15.3 3.1 <.001
Acculturation, 1 = low, 5 = high 3.3 1.5 2.9 1.3 2.5 1.3 2.9 1.4 <.001
Social Support, 1 = low, 5 = high 3.2 1.3 3.0 1.4 2.7 1.3 3.0 1.4 0.004
Immigration Stress, 1 = low, 4 = high 2.0 0.6 2.1 0.6 2.2 0.5 2.1 0.6 0.043

Note. Percentages are of “yes” responses. Each category of Marital Power Structure was tested as a dichotomous variable (1 = named category, 0 = all other categories). p-values are for chi-square or ANOVA tests of difference by age group.