Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Violence. 2012 Sep 23;27(8):801–811. doi: 10.1007/s10896-012-9471-z

Table 3.

Final Model for Logistic Regression Analysis of Psychological Aggression in the Past Year for Those with an Intimate Partner in the Past Year, by Age Group

Variable Age 18–39 (n = 165) Age 40–54 (n = 224) Age 55+ (n = 106)
p odds ratio 95% CI Δpr p odds ratio 95% CI Δpr p odds ratio 95% CI Δpr

Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper
Education, Years 0.076 1.166 0.984 1.381 0.096 0.526 1.050 0.904 1.219 0.021 0.433 1.069 0.905 1.262 0.037
Acculturation, 1 = low, 5 = high 0.058 1.459 0.988 2.154 0.121 0.866 1.027 0.754 1.398 0.006 0.428 1.229 0.738 2.045 0.038
Employed, 1 = yes, 0 = no 0.013 2.943 1.251 6.923 0.112 0.252 1.455 0.765 2.766 0.035 0.382 1.776 0.490 6.436 0.034
Male Dominant Power = 1, Else = 0 0.196 2.346 0.644 8.542 0.059 0.013 2.422 1.205 4.864 0.069 0.674 1.330 0.352 5.023 0.016
Social Support, 1 = low, 5 = high 0.000 2.027 1.442 2.847 0.197 0.297 1.131 0.897 1.425 0.031 0.999 1.000 0.661 1.515 0.000
Immigration Stress, 1 = low, 4 = high 0.018 2.915 1.197 7.098 0.145 0.025 2.153 1.099 4.217 0.078 0.023 4.635 1.238 17.357 0.099

Note. Δpr gives the change in predicted probability of psychological aggression as the independent variable changes from 1/2 standard deviation below mean value to 1/2 standard deviation above, while holding each other predictor at its mean value.