Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 7;4(6):403–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00349.x

Table 8.

Opportunities for improvement and possible interventions to address them in clinical research processes.

Identified opportunity Potential intervention
Motivation
• Altruism as motivation for participation Compensation as second order motivation for participation Free healthcare as motivation • Consider role of altruism in planning recruitment, retention, and conduct Moderate the emphasis on compensation in recruitment Guard against undue influence; facilitate access to available alternatives
Informed consent
• Some participants under estimate risk ­Participants do not understand the research study plan “Diagnostic Misconception” that screening tests equal a clean bill of health • Develop means to test and enhance understanding of study risks and requirements of participating Reconstruct informed consent to address the limitations of study‐related testing
Study conduct and retention
• Participants desire, but do not receive their clinical results • Implement standardized procedures to share clinical results with participants
• Participants desire, but are not informed of the results of the research study in which they participated • Evaluate ethical issues relative to sharing overall research results Where appropriate, develop and test standard procedures for sharing overall research results with participants
• Positive impact of professional and organized conduct by staff
• Negative impact of unprofessional or disorganized conduct by staff • Educate research teams on the impact of professionalism on ­participants’ experiences and willingness to continue in studies.
• Develop metrics for quality review and improvements on key items such as courtesy, respect, timeliness, and organizational workflow
• Under‐appreciated value of “research partnership” to participants • Explicitly acknowledge and respect role of participant as essential partner in research process