Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 22;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-8

Table 2.

Association of intervention and overall stress and stress level at different time points

  Intervention group Control group Difference (95% CI) p
Stress/overload measures
n=62
n=62
 
 
Intention-to-treat analysis (n=124)
 
 
 
 
Overall stress/overload
 
 
 
 
Mean overall stress/overload during resuscitation, mean (SE)
10.6 (±0.21)
11.2 (±0.24)
−0.6 (95% CI −1.3, -0.1)
0.04
Stress/overload during different time points
 
 
 
 
Stress/overload at baseline, mean (SE)
9.6 (±0.37)
10.6 (±0.42)
−1 (95% CI −2.1, -0.1)
0.08
Stress/overload during resuscitation, mean (SE)
15.9 (±0.34)
15.6 (±0.34)
0.2 (95% CI −0.7, -1.2)
0.66
Stress/overload when patients awakes, mean (SE)
9.3 (±0.41)
10.4 (±0.48)
−1.0 (95% CI −2.3, 0.2)
0.1
Stress/overload during debriefing, mean (SE)
7.4 (±0.36)
7.8 (±0.36)
−0.4 (95% CI −1.4, 0.6)
0.42
Per-protocol analysis n=108
n=46
n=62
 
 
Overall stress/overload
 
 
 
 
Mean overall stress/overload during resuscitation, mean (SE)
10.4 (±0.26)
11.2 (±0.24)
−0.8 (95% CI −1.5, -0.1)
0.02
Stress/overload during different time points
 
 
 
 
Stress/overload at baseline, mean (SE)
9.1 (±0.37)
10.6 (±0.42)
−1.5 (95% CI −2.7, -0.4)
0.01
Stress/overload during resuscitation, mean (SE)
15.5 (±0.43)
15.6 (±0.34)
−0.1 (95% CI −1.2, 0.9)
0.79
Stress/overload when patients awakes, mean (SE)
9.4 (±0.52)
10.4 (±0.48)
−0.9 (95% CI −2.4, 0.5)
0.18
Stress/overload during debriefing, mean (SE) 7.5 (±0.42) 7.8 (±0.36) −0.2 (95% CI −1.3, 0.8) 0.66

SE denotes standard error; 95% CI confidence interval, Intention-to-treat analysis includes all randomized participants, per-protocol analysis includes only participants who followed the instructions in the intervention group.