Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;13:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-95

Table 3.

Protocol compliance as assessed by proportion of women having investigations and induction of labour (IOL)

Intervention Control (n = 60) Intensive (n = 60) Total (n = 120)
Ultrasound Scan
58 (97%)
60 (100%)
118 (98%)
Abnormal EFW, LV or UAD
5 (8%)
12 (20%)
17 (14%)
hPL
0 (0%)
60 (100%)
60 (50%)
Abnormal hPL (<0.8 MoM)
-
18 (30%)
18 (15%)
 
Control (n = 58)
Intensive (n = 60)
Total (n = 118)
IOL
34 (59%)
37 (62%)
71 (60%)
Indication for IOL
 
 
 
RFM
15 (26%)
30 (50%)
45 (38%)
Cholestasis
1 (2%)
1 (2%)
2 (2%)
Hypertension/Preeclampsia
0
1 (2%)
1 (1%)
Polyhydramnios
1 (2%)
0
1 (1%)
Prolonged pregnancy
4 (7%)
2 (3%)
6 (5%)
Prolonged rupture of membranes
10 (17%)
3 (5%)
13 (11%)
Small for gestational age
2 (3%)
0
2 (2%)
Suspicious cardiotocograph on subsequent presentation
1 (2%)
0
1 (1%)
Gestation at Delivery
40+1 (37+0–42+1)
39+6 (36+4–42+0)
40+0 (36+4–42+1)
Delivery by CS
8 (14%)
4 (7%)
12 (10%)
Instrumental Delivery 11 (19%) 15 (25%) 26 (22%)

Absolute values are shown with percentages in parentheses. † = Denominator value of 58 (as two outcomes unknown). ‡ The 30 women induced for RFM in the intensive arm all had either abnormal scan findings or low hPL.