Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;47(12):1219–1227. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01664.x

Table 3.

Pre-attack stress-load, appraisal and coping predicting 9/11-specific appraisals and coping

9/11-specific
Threat appraisal Positive
appraisal
Active coping Avoidant coping




Predictors β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2
Step 1: Controls .09* .02 .05 .08*
 Age −.19* .01 −.12 −.22**
 Gender1 .06 −.11 −.06 .10
 Time since previous interview −.15 .01 −.03 −.02
 Time since 9/11 −.12 .01 −.05 −.09
 Pre-attack Symptomatology .18* .05 .17 .12
Step 2: Indirect exposure .00 .00 .01 .04*
 Knowing someone −.05 .03 −.01 −.03
 Media exposure .02 −.06 −.10 −.19*
Step 3: Pre-attack stress-load .19* .03* −.01 .00 −.01 .00 .20* .03*
Step 4: Pre-attack appraisal and coping .10** .10** .11* .12**
 Threat appraisal style .30* −.12 −.08 .19
 Positive appraisal style −.17 .24* .22 .14
 Active coping style .21 .04 .01 −.29*
 Avoidant coping style −.00 .15 .20 .32**
1

Girl = 1, boy = 2.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01.