Planning |
1. Scoping workshop |
|
- Collecting existing knowledge and practice |
|
2. Structured search |
|
- Structured literature search using a predefined search model |
|
- Structured search in indicator agencies |
|
3. Organization of the assessment panel |
|
- 11 multidisciplinary experts and 2patient representatives |
|
4. Preparation of quality indicators for the panel assessment |
|
- Defining of the indicator (numerator, denominator) |
|
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria |
|
- Target levels or standards |
|
- Type (process, outcome, intermediate outcome, structure) |
|
- Sources |
|
- Evidence |
Rating |
5. Preliminary meting |
|
- Overview about the development procedures |
|
- Providing of indicator templates |
|
6. Rating rounds |
|
- Validity – postal and meeting |
|
- Feasibility – postal and meeting |
Operationalizing |
7. Specification of measures |
|
- Unit of analysis (patient, hospital, provider) |
|
- Data sources (administrative data, medical record data, survey) |
|
- Risk adjustment |
|
- Responsibility for indicator results |
|
- Data sources |
|
- Data collection procedures |
|
- Analytical plan |
|
- Feedback strategies |
Approval |
8. Approval of the final report by the G-BA |
Piloting |
9. Feasibility test |
|
10. Field testing |