Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Oct 8;23(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9851-3

Table 1.

Summary characteristics of the studies on association between Vitamin D and mammographic breast density

Study haracteristic n (%) Sample size range Total sample size
across all studies
Study population
Breast cancer survivors (postmenopausal only)   1 (7%) 426 426
Healthy women 13 (93%) 99–1,668 10,339
  Premenopausal/Perimenopausala 11 (79%) 38–777 3,739
  Postmenopausal* 11 (79%) 61–1,244 5,863
Race/Ethnicity
  Predominantly white   9 (64%) 157–1,668 9,013
  Hispanic   1 (7%) 99 1,471
  Mixed   4 (29%) 182–808 1,653
Study design
  Prospective   2 (14%) 1,161–1,668 2,829
  Cross-sectional 12 (86%) 99–1,560 7,936
Exposure (Vitamin D) assessment
  Food frequency questionnaire   2 (14%) 237–1,668 1,905
  Food frequency questionnaire + supplements   7 (50%) 99–1,560 5,329
  Dietary 5-day recording   1 (7%) 1,161 1,161
  Circulating 25(OH)D levels   5 (36%) 182–960 2,796
  Circulating 1,25(OH)2D levels   1 (7%) 960 960
Breast density assessment approach
  Percent breast density (continuous) 12 (86%) 99–1,560 8,940
  Categorical breast density   2 (14%) 157–1,668 1,825
a

One study did not report the exact number of pre- and postmenopausal women in the study population