Table 4.

Site-specific HCS for low-salience hallucinators¹

	1st 5-session block (week 1)	2nd 5-session block (week 2)
Active to W2	6 (1.00), n=6	8.39 (1.02), n=9
Active to rW3	9 (0.81), n=9	4 (1.25), n=6
Sham to W	9.83 (1.41), n=3	9.2 (1.37), n=5
Sham to rW	9.1 (1.09), n=5	8.83 (1.77), n=3

¹Model-based least-square means and standard errors; model included group, site, salience, and time as factors; group by site by salience by time interaction (p=0.015); site-crossing after the first 5 session block, W→rW and rW→W

²Difference (post-hoc) between active and sham targeting W, week 1 significant (p=0.035)

³Difference (post-hoc) between active and sham targeting rW, week 2 significant (p=0.029), suggesting a site-order effect since rW→W did not produce a similar active/sham difference