Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 8;31(14):1748–1757. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1882

Table 4.

Comparative Kattan Nomogram Versus Kattan Plus BRCA Status

Model and End Point 5 Year
8 Year
10 Year
AUC (%) Likelihood Ratio Test P* AUC (%) Likelihood Ratio Test P* AUC (%) Likelihood Ratio Test P*
All patients with local (N0 and M0) disease
    Evaluable patients, n 927 521 267
        Metastasis-free survival
            Kattan model 81.1 76.2 76.6
            Kattan + BRCA 82.5 .048 76.6 .128 77.8 .143
        Cause-specific survival
            Kattan model 79.9 77.6 76.1
            Kattan + BRCA 80.5 .102 78.9 .083 77.0 .076
        Overall survival
            Kattan model 79.6 78.1 76.2
            Kattan + BRCA 81.5 .071 79.8 .002 77.3 .096
Patients treated with prostatectomy for N0 and M0 disease
    Evaluable patients, n 397 188 79
        Metastasis-free survival
            Kattan model 82.4 81.0 81.4
            Kattan + BRCA 91.0 .122 88.7 .158 87.0 .007
    Cause specific survival
            Kattan model 76.7 75.0 72.1
            Kattan + BRCA 80.9 .148 81.7 .081 82.0 .002
        Overall survival
            Kattan model 88.7 81.5 76.0
            Kattan + BRCA 91.1 .277 84.5 .020 80.0 .005

Abbreviation: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

*

Comparison of the logistic regression model for original Kattan nomogram alone (baseline prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and clinical tumor [T] stage) score versus the addition of BRCA carrier status using the likelihood ratio test.

All these survival analyses were handled as a simple binary variable for the logistic regression analyses. The number of patients for the different time points differs from the total of patients because those lost to follow-up before the end of the fixed time point were considered not to be evaluable for the analysis.