Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2012 May 21;366(25):2345–2357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635

Table 4.

Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality According to Location and Stage.

Variable Cancer Stage Total
I II III IV Carcinoid Unknown
Flexible-sigmoidoscopy group
Cases of colorectal cancer — no. 334 240 241 140 32 25 1012
Deaths from colorectal cancer — no. (%) 20 (6.0) 26 (10.8) 70 (29.0) 113 (80.7) 3 (9.4) 20 (80.0) 252 (24.9)
Cases of distal colorectal cancer — no. 202 110 96 41 24 6 479
Deaths from distal colorectal cancer — no. (%) 11 (5.4) 15 (13.6) 28 (29.2) 33 (80.5) 0 0 87 (18.2)
Cases of proximal colorectal cancer — no. 131 130 145 96 8 2 512
Deaths from proximal colorectal cancer — no. (%) 9 (6.9) 11 (8.5) 42 (29.0) 78 (81.2) 3 (37.5) 0 143 (27.9)
Usual-care group
Cases of colorectal cancer — no. 407 309 328 209 9 25 1287
Deaths from colorectal cancer — no. (%) 21 (5.2) 33 (10.7) 102 (31.1) 163 (78.0) 4 (44.4) 18 (72.0) 341 (26.5)
Cases of distal colorectal cancer — no. 252 144 157 107 3 6 669
Deaths from distal colorectal cancer — no. (%) 14 (5.6) 25 (17.4) 50 (31.8) 84 (78.5) 1 (33.3) 1 (16.7) 175 (26.2)
Cases of proximal colorectal cancer — no. 153 164 170 98 6 4 595
Deaths from proximal colorectal cancer — no. (%) 7 (4.6) 8 (4.9) 52 (30.6) 77 (78.6) 3 (50.0) 0 147 (24.7)
Between-group differences*
Distal colorectal cancer
 Cases — no. (% reduction in incidence) 50 (19.8) 34 (23.6) 61 (38.9) 66 (61.7) -21 (-700.0) 0 190
 Deaths — no. (% reduction in mortality) 3 (21.4) 10 (40.0) 22 (44.0) 51 (60.7) 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 88
Proximal colorectal cancer
 Cases — no. (% reduction in incidence) 22 (14.4) 34 (20.7) 25 (14.7) 2 (2.0) −2 (−33.3) 2 (50.0) 83
 Deaths — no. (% reduction in mortality) −2 (−8.6) −3 (−37.5) 10 (19.2) −1 (−1.3) 0 0 4
*

Differences in cases and deaths were calculated as the number in the usual-care group minus the number in the flexible-sigmoidoscopy group. The percentage difference was calculated as 100 – [(flexible-sigmoidoscopy rate ÷ usual-care rate) × 100]. The flexible-sigmoidoscopy rate was defined as cases in the flexible-sigmoidoscopy group divided by the flexible-sigmoidoscopy population, and the usual-care rate as cases in the usual-care group divided by the usual-care population.