Skip to main content
. 2013 May 2;8(5):e62984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062984

Table 3. Relative validation results, using the document as text window.

Subset 25% entities validated 50% entities validated 75% entities validated
Measure Method TP Ratio P Increase TP Ratio P Increase TP Ratio P Increase
2*SimGIC Dict 35.0 39.9 68.8 38.7 92.4 23.5
CRF 28.5 14.1 58.1 16.3 78.6 4.7
2*SimUI Dict 31.4 23.5 61.4 21.4 88.7 15.6
CRF 27.9 11.2 55.0 10.0 79.1 6.3
2*Resnik Dict 31.8 25.1 73.6 46.1 96.5 28.4
CRF 30.3 22.8 55.0 9.4 83.0 10.7

For selected subsets of validated entities corresponding to 25%, 50% and 75% of the total amount on annotations performed by each tool (Method), we present the True Positive ratio (TP Ratio), which corresponds to the percentage of True Positives remaining in the subset, and the Precision increase relative to the Precision for the total amount on annotations (P Increase). For this evaluation was used the document-wide as text window.