Skip to main content
. 2013 May;29(4):395–402. doi: 10.1089/jop.2012.0102

Table 1.

Effect of Lifitegrast (SAR 1118) on Corneal Inflammation

Expt Inoculum Group Number of mice Time of applicationsa Neutrophils/section % inhibition P
1 PA Vehicle 3 −15 h, −3 h, −1 h 348.0    
    5% SAR 1118 3   195.7 46 0.01
2 PA Vehicle 4 −15 h, −3 h 376.5    
    1% SAR 1118 3   171.3 53 0.001
    0.1% SAR 1118 3   158.7 48 0.001
3 PA Vehicle 5 −15 h, −3 h, −1 h 359.8    
    5% SAR 1118 5   271.2 23 0.01
    1% SAR 1118 5   211.8 42 0.001
    0.1% SAR 1118 5   241.4 35 0.01
4 PA Vehicle 3 −15 h, −3 h 385.3    
    0.1% SAR 1118 3   275.0 36 0.015
    1% SAR 1118 4   162.0 62 0.004
    5% SAR 1118       35 0.016
5 SA Vehicle 4 −15 h, −3 h 242.0    
    1% SAR 1118 4   112.0 53 0.005
6 PA Vehicle 3 −1 h, +1 h 373.3 0  
    1% SAR 1118 3   336.7   0.398
7 PA Vehicle 5 −1 h, +1 h 245.8 28  
    0.1% SAR 1118 5   175.8   0.206
8 PA Vehicle 4 −1 h, +1 h 445.3 0  
    5% SAR 1118 3   494.3   −0.227
a

before or after corneal abrasion and stimulation with P. aeruginosa or S. aureus.

PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; SA, Staphylococcus aureus; NS, not significant (P>0.05).