Table 7.
Multivariate logistic regression models of the impact of socio-demographics and house flies knowledge on house flies preventive measures
| Model | H0 | −2LL* | P£ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locality + Education + Breeding site knowledge + Preventive measures knowledge + Int** |
|
70.51 |
---- |
| Locality + Education + Breeding site knowledge + Preventive measures knowledge |
βInt = 0 |
71.78 |
0.866 |
| Education + Breeding site knowledge + Preventive measures knowledge |
βLocality = 0 |
74.74 |
0.261 |
| Education + Breeding site knowledge | βPreventive measures knowledge = 0 | 76.76 | 0.043 |
*-2 log likelihood, ** All possible 2 way interactions, £ p values based on chi square of −2 log likelihood difference between the reduced model and initial model. The predictors: locality, education level of the farmers, farmers’ knowledge about house flies breeding sites and preventive measures, had P values < 0.25 and were the potential predictors in univariate analysis (Table 6). These four potential predictors were then entered in the multivariate model by following the methodology of Hosmer and Lemeshow [17]. In succeeding steps, the predictors with a P > 0.05 in the previous step were removed from the model until complete loss of fit (P < 0.05) of the model was achieved.