Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2013 Apr 7;497(7447):122–126. doi: 10.1038/nature12052

Fig. 4. Negative regulation of TET3 by its CXXC domain.

Fig. 4

a. Schematic representation of TET3, TET3-CXXCmut and catalytically-inactive TET3-HxDmut.

b. Increased protein expression of TET3-CXXCmut relative to WT TET3 or TET3-HxDmut (left panel), without a change in TET3 mRNA levels (right panel).

c. In-cell western assays confirm that TET3-CXXCmut is expressed at higher levels than WT TET3 or TET3-HxDmut.

d. WT TET3 and TET3-HxDmut are mainly nuclear, whereas TET3-CXXCmut is found in both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions and is less effective at inducing PARP cleavage than WT TET3.

e. Cells expressing TET3-CXXCmut show higher genomic 5hmC than cells expressing WT TET3 or TET3-HxDmut (anti-CMS dot blot3).

f. Cxxc5 expression results in a decrease in protein levels of co-expressed Tet2 in HEK293T cells.

g. Potential intramolecular (auto-inhibitory) interaction between the linked CXXC and catalytic domains of TET3.