Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bipolar Disord. 2013 Mar 26;15(3):264–271. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12059

Table 2.

Performance in Eriksen Flanker task by trial typea

At-risk (n = 22) Healthy controls (n = 20)
Proportion correct, mean (SD)
 Neutral 0.97 (0.05) 0.98 (0.04)
 Congruent 0.98 (0.03) 0.97 (0.04)
 Incongruent 0.93 (0.06) 0.95 (0.15)
Intrasubject variability, mean (95% CI)
 Neutral 65 (59–72) 59 (53–67)
 Congruentb 69 (64–75) 59 (55–63)
 Incongruentc 67 (61–72) 53 (49–60)
Response time, mean (SD)
 Neutrald 467 (71) 450 (34)
 Congruentd 474 (67) 457 (42)
 Incongruentc 516 (60) 503 (30)

SD = standard deviation; CI = confidence interval.

a

Analysis covaried for IQ.

b

p < 0.05.

c

p < 0.01.

d

p < 0.001.