Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 5;29(4):843–853. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0158-6

Table 3.

CMR findings in subjects with CSS, WG and controls

CMR parameters CSS (n = 11) / WG (n = 10) p All (n = 21) / Controls (n = 21) p
LVEF [%] 68.0 ± 6.1 / 66.0 ± 5.0 0.89 66.2 ± 5.8 / 63.4 ± 3.4 0.13
LVEDV index [ml/m2] 66.1 ± 4.0 / 66.1 ± 8.5 0.99 66.1 ± 6.6 / 69.9 ± 8.2 0.15
LV mass index [g/m2] 56.9 ± 7.8 / 65.5 ± 8.6 0.02 61.0 ± 8.9 / 49.7 ± 7.8 <0.001
RVEF [%] 63.7 ± 3.7 / 58.9 ± 6.3 0.05 61.4 ± 5.7 / 60.3 ± 7.1 0.60
RVEDV index [ml/m2] 68.0 ± 6.9 / 69.6 ± 9.0 0.65 68.8 ± 7.8 / 71.9 ± 8.3 0.28
RV mass index [g/m2] 17.8 ± 3.2 / 16.7 ± 1.9 0.36 17.3 ± 2.5 / 17.6 ± 2.2 0.68
Myocardial SI-T2 ratio at mid LV level 1.2 ± 0.2 / 1.3 ± 0.2 0.33 1.3 ± 0.2 / 1.2 ± 0.3 0.37
Myocardial EGE ratio at mid LV level 2.2 ± 0.8 / 2.3 ± 0.3 0.71 2.2 ± 0.6 / 2.2 ± 0.9 0.88
Pericardial effusion 2 / 2 >0.99 4 / 0 0.11
Localized pericardial thickening 2 / 4 0.36 6 / 0 0.02
Decreased εps ≥2 LV segments 9 / 8 >0.99 17 / 0 <0.001
Decreased εps: total (mean) LV segment number 66 (6.0 ± 3.4) / 70 (7.0 ± 3.9) >0.99 (0.53) 136 (6.5 ± 3.6) / 4 (0.2 ± 0.4) <0.001 (< 0.001)
Decreased ε ps
Longitudinally: total (mean) LV segment number 49 (4.5 ± 2.8) / 32 (3.2 ± 2.3) 0.12 (0.28) 81 (3.9 ± 2.6) / 2 (0.1 ± 0.3) <0.001 (<0.001)
Circumferentially: total (mean) LV segment number 12 (1.6 ± 1.7) / 24 (2.4 ± 1.6) 0.06 (0.32) 36 (2.0 ± 1.7) / 2 (0.1 ± 0.3) <0.001 (<0.001)
Radially: total (mean) LV segment number 18 (1.1 ± 1.1) / 29 (2.9 ± 1.7) 0.05 (0.01) 47 (2.0 ± 1.7) / 2 (0.1 ± 0.3) <0.001 (<0.001)
LVLGE: present (segment number) 9 (2.2 ± 1.7) / 8 (2.5 ± 2.3) 0.64 (0.72) 17 (2.3 ± 2.0) / 0 (0.0 ± 0.0) <0.001 (<0.001)
LVLGE: subendocardial/midwall/subepicardial 3/5/4 / 3/5/4 >0.99 6/10/8 / 0/0/0 <0.001
RVLGE: present (segment number) 4 (0.8 ± 1.0) / 3 (0.6 ± 1.1) >0.99 (0.80) 7 (0.7 ± 1.2) / 0 (0.0 ± 0.0) 0.009 (0.01)