Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2013 May 14;57(6):2338–2345. doi: 10.1002/hep.26264

Table 3.

Serum CML-AGE and sRAGE in relation to risk of liver cancer, ATBC Study, 1985–2006

Tertiles
1 2 3 Ptrenda Continuous b P-value
sRAGE
   Range, pg/mL <465.4 465.4 – <670.9 ≥670.9
   Case/subcohort 54/162 47/162 44/161
   Model 1, HR (95% CI)c 1.00 0.89 (0.55, 1.43) 0.74 (0.46, 1.18) 0.21 0.84 (0.73, 0.97) 0.02
   Model 2, HR (95% CI)d 1.00 0.91 (0.56, 1.47) 0.77 (0.48, 1.24) 0.28 0.86 (0.75, 0.99) 0.04
CML-AGE
   Range, ng/mL <505.4 505.4 – <616.9 ≥616.9
   Case/subcohort 85/162 45/162 15/162
   Model 1, HR (95% CI)c 1.00 0.50 (0.32, 0.79) 0.17 (0.09, 0.32) <0.0001 0.73 (0.64, 0.82) <0.0001
   Model 2, HR (95% CI)d 1.00 0.52 (0.33, 0.81) 0.19 (0.10, 0.35) <0.0001 0.74 (0.65, 0.84) <0.0001
a

Trend test based on median values of each tertile

b

Hazard ratios for continuous sRAGE and CML-AGE were standardized to the average size of the central tertile (sRAGE, 205.5 pg/mL; CML-AGE, 111.4 ng/mL).

c

Hazard ratio, adjusted for age

d

Hazard ratio, adjusted for age, BMI, years of smoking