TABLE 7.
Advantages and Limitations of Hair Cotinine as a Biomarker for Nicotine Exposure
| Advantages |
| Information on long-term exposure due to presence of cotinine in hair indefinitely |
| Absence of drug metabolism in hair provides a historical account of exposure |
| Uniform hair growth allows segmental analysis reflecting a specified exposure period |
| Standard laboratory techniques are reliable, sensitive, and specific to quantify cotinine in hair |
| Less variability than measurement of cotinine in other matrices allows better discrimination among individuals by exposure status |
| Hair collection is noninvasive and easy in most children well suited in a pediatric setting |
| Careful sample handling and storage not required. Sample is stable for up to 5 years |
| Objective measure of exposure—no recall bias, underreporting, and lack of awareness |
| No time activity patterns data required |
| Cotinine as opposed to nicotine in hair reflects only systemic exposure |
| Highly specific to nicotine intake |
| Allows fetal exposure assessment by measuring newborn’s hair at birth |
| Disadvantages |
| Interindividual variation in uptake and metabolism of nicotine results in some variability in cotinine levels |
| Irregular hair growth in some |
| Hair color and hair treatments affect cotinine concentration |
| More costly than questionnaires |
| Scarce hair (especially in infants) |
| Need to weigh hair |