Skip to main content
. 2013 May 2;92(5):744–759. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.04.004

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Power when a Subset of Phenotypes Are Associated with SNP

Power results for control-only analysis (n0=700) from the scaled heterogeneous effect model for M=4 phenotypes (A–C) and M=10 phenotypes (D–F) for various numbers of a subset of phenotypes associated with SNP (M0). Three working correlation matrix structures for the joint outcome analyses were considered: I, independent; E, exchangeable; and U, unstructured. Power results were nearly identical with the use of I, E, and U for the 4-DF GEE tests, whereas power results were nearly identical with I and E, but not U, in the 1-DF SMAT; thus, only the results for GEE (U) and SMAT (E and U) are included.