Table 6. Statistical comparison of isotig and singleton predicted coding sequence lengths according to BLAST annotation status.
BLAST hit1/predicted protein coding status2 | Significant hit against nr2 | No significant hit against nr | All NRAS3 | No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Locusta migratoria sequences | No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Laupala kohalensis sequences |
ISOTIGS 4 | |||||
Significant hit against nr | *** | 1 | ** | *** | |
No significant hit against nr | *** | 1 | 1 | ||
All NRAS | * | 0.0059 | |||
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Locusta migratoria sequences | 0.4052 | ||||
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Laupala kohalensis sequences | |||||
SINGLETONS | |||||
Significant hit against nr | *** | 1 | *** | *** | |
No significant hit against nr | *** | 1 | 1 | ||
All NRAS | 0.4091 | 0.9235 | |||
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Locusta migratoria sequences | 0.8685 | ||||
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Laupala kohalensis sequences |
Values shown are p≥0.05 value results of a Welch's t-test.
= p<0.0001;
p<0.001;
p<0.05.
BLAST E-value cutoff is e-5 for all hits reported in this table.
nr = NCBI non-redundant database.
NRAS = all non-redundant assembly products regardless of BLAST results against nr.