Skip to main content
. 2013 May 6;8(5):e61479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061479

Table 6. Statistical comparison of isotig and singleton predicted coding sequence lengths according to BLAST annotation status.

BLAST hit1/predicted protein coding status2 Significant hit against nr2 No significant hit against nr All NRAS3 No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Locusta migratoria sequences No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Laupala kohalensis sequences
ISOTIGS 4
Significant hit against nr *** 1 ** ***
No significant hit against nr *** 1 1
All NRAS * 0.0059
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Locusta migratoria sequences 0.4052
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Laupala kohalensis sequences
SINGLETONS
Significant hit against nr *** 1 *** ***
No significant hit against nr *** 1 1
All NRAS 0.4091 0.9235
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Locusta migratoria sequences 0.8685
No significant hit against nr and significant hit against Laupala kohalensis sequences

Values shown are p≥0.05 value results of a Welch's t-test.

***

 = p<0.0001;

**

p<0.001;

*

p<0.05.

1

BLAST E-value cutoff is e-5 for all hits reported in this table.

2

nr = NCBI non-redundant database.

3

NRAS = all non-redundant assembly products regardless of BLAST results against nr.

4

Numbers of sequences in each category are shown in Figure 9. Mean, median, maximum and minimum values for each category are shown in Tables 3 and 4.