Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 1;168(6):581–592. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10101411

TABLE 2.

Effect Sizes in Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Interpersonal Psychotherapy With Control Conditions, Pharmacotherapy, and other Psychotherapiesa

Comparison Number of
Comparisons
d 95% CI Hetero-
geneityb
pc Number Needed
to Treat
IPT versus control condition
All studies 16 0.63*** 0.36 to 0.90 82.96*** 2.91
Outlier removedd 15 0.52*** 0.36 to 0.68 42.84* 3.50
HAM-D only 9 0.60*** 0.39 to 0.81 40.47 3.05
BDI only 7 0.60*** 0.32 to 0.89 59.62* 3.05
Subgroup analysese
 Adapted manual
  No 5 0.29 0.12 to 0.47 0.00 0.004 6.17
  Yes 10 0.67 0.48 to 0.85 27.52 2.75
 Target group
  Adults in general 3 0.37** 0.15 to 0.58 0.00 0.214 4.85
  Adolescents 5 0.63*** 0.43 to 0.82 0.00 2.91
  Specific target group 7 0.53** 0.19 to 0.87 68.11** 3.42
 Basis of diagnosis
  Diagnostic interview 12 0.57*** 0.40 to 0.73 29.74 0.424 3.18
  Self-report 3 0.38 −0.04 to 0.80 67.73* 4.72
 Control group
  Usual care 6 0.50*** 0.28 to 0.72 32.20 0.182 3.62
  Waiting list 3 0.81*** 0.42 to 1.20 59.63 2.30
  Other 5 0.38** 0.14 to 0.62 0.00 4.72
 Intent-to-treat analysis
  Yes 10 0.57*** 0.38 to 0.76 51.56* 0.718 3.18
  No 4 0.50** 0.16 to 0.84 12.97 3.62
IPT versus other psychotherapyf
All studies 13 0.04 −0.14 to 0.21 39.81 45.45
One effect size per study (highest) 10 0.01 −0.20 to 0.21 44.59 166.67
One effect size per study (lowest) 10 0.00 −0.20 to 0.19 41.11
HAM-D only 10 0.12 −0.07 to 0.31 19.04 14.71
BDI only 7 0.28 −0.02 to 0.57 45.46 6.41
Studies on dysthymia excluded 11 0.01 −0.18 to 0.20 42.09 166.67
Subgroup analysese
 Adapted manual
  Yes 7 −0.09 −0.25 to 0.07 0.00 0.098 20.00
  No 6 0.25 −0.12 to 0.63 62.27* 7.14
 Comparison group
  CBT 9 −0.04 −0.23 to 0.16 39.72 0.113 45.45
  Other psychotherapy 4 0.27 −0.06 to 0.59 4.68 6.58
 Target group
  Adults 8 −0.08 −0.24 to 0.08 0.00 0.116 21.74
  More specific group 5 0.31 −0.15 to 0.77 69.51* 5.75
 Intent-to-treat analysis
  Yes 9 0.16 −0.06 to 0.38 35.74 0.106 11.11
  No 3 −0.13 −0.40 to 0.15 0.00 13.51
IPT versus pharmacotherapyf
All studies 10 −0.12 −0.36 to 0.12 61.98** 14.71
Outlier removedg 9 −0.19* −0.38 to −0.01 30.95 9.43
HAM-D only 8 −0.16 −0.43 to 0.11 57.39* 11.11
BDI only 3 −0.31 −0.72 to 0.09 40.39 5.75
Studies on dysthymia excluded 7 −0.12 −0.33 to 0.09 23.78 14.71
Subgroup analysese
 Medicationh
  SSRI or SNRI 3 −0.39** −0.68 to −0.11 14.18 0.037 4.59
  Tricyclic antidepressant 4 −0.02 −0.22 to 0.19 0.00 83.33
 Intent-to-treat analysis
  Yes 5 −0.15 −0.42 to 0.13 45.10 0.450 11.90
  No 4 −0.28* −0.50 to −0.06 0.00 6.41
Pharmacotherapy versus
combination treatmenti
All studies 10 0.16 −0.03 to 0.36 39.26 11.11
HAM-D only 8 0.21 −0.11 to 0.52 64.64** 8.47
BDI only 2 0.10 −0.20 to 0.41 0.00 17.86
Studies on dysthymia excluded 7 0.22 −0.03 to 0.47 44.17 8.06
Subgroup analyses
 Adapted manual
  Yes 5 0.23 −0.04 to 0.51 50.15 0.494 7.69
  No 5 0.08 −0.25 to 0.41 40.50 21.74
 Medication
  SSRI 5 0.07 −0.27 to 0.41 64.96* 0.562 25.00
  Tricyclic antidepressant 2 0.33 −0.11 to 0.76 0.00 5.43
  Other/protocol 3 0.27 −0.00 to 0.54 0.00 6.58
 Target group
  Adults 5 0.07 −0.12 to 0.27 0.00 0.569 25.00
  More specific group 5 0.19 −0.16 to 0.54 61.35* 9.43
 Intent-to-treat analysis
  Yes 6 0.12 −0.10 to 0.34 23.03 0.391 14.71
  No 4 0.35 −0.12 to 0.82 63.84* 5.10
a

These data are from analysis using the random effects model. BDI=Beck Depression Inventory; HAM-D=Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; IPT=interpersonal psychotherapy; SNRI=serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI=selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

b

Variance between studies as a proportion of the total variance; heterogeneity tested using the I2 statistic. Low heterogeneity=25%; moderate heterogeneity=50%; high heterogeneity=75%. The p values indicated in this column refer to whether the Q statistic is significant (the I2 statistic does not include a test of significance).

c

The p values in this column indicate whether the difference between the effect sizes in the subgroups is significant.

d

Bolton et al. (39).

e

Subgroup analyses are conducted without outliers.

f

Positive effect sizes indicate superior effects of IPT.

g

Finkenzeller et al. (44).

h

Two studies in which other pharmacotherapies were used (nefazodone, protocolized treatment) were excluded from these analyses.

i

Positive effect sizes indicate superior effects of combination treatment.

*

p<0.05.

**

p<0.01.

***

p<0.001.