Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences logoLink to Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
. 2012 Nov-Dec;15(6):1180–1184.

Phase Angle Measurement in Healthy Human Subjects through Bio-Impedance Analysis

Satish Kumar 1,*, Aswini Dutt 1, Sandhya Hemraj 2, Shankar Bhat 1, Bhat Manipadybhima 1
PMCID: PMC3646229  PMID: 23653848

Abstract

Objective(s)

Bioelectrical impedance is the measure of impedance of the body. Impedance consists of electric resistance and reactance. Phase angle (PA) is the tan value of the ratio of reactance versus electric resistance. PA depends on cell membrane integrity and on body cell mass. There exists a correlation between PA values and body cell mass.

The objective of this study was to compare the PA values of normal individuals and their anthropometric measurements.

Materials and Methods

Anthropometric measurements, Bioelectrical impedance analysis and PA measurements were done using Bodystat Quadscan 4000 machine on 42 healthy subjects between the age group of 18 to 50 yrs at a private hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India for eight months. Kolmogrov-Smirnov and Pearson’s correlation tests were used for data analysis.

Results

The PA values were 7.321.17º in healthy subjects. PA values were significantly positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (r= 0.011, P<0.001). The phase angle values for males and females were 7.43±0.98º and 7.05±1.1.58º, respectively.

Conclusion

PA values positively correlated with BMI indicating the nutritional status of the study group. PA values were similar to the values to found in other studies.

Key Words: Bioelectrical Impedance, Body composition, Electric Resistance

Introduction

Bioelectrical impedance is the measure of resistance and reactance of the body. It is used indirectly to measure the body fat composition. The total impedance is the total sum of impedance of different tissues. It was thought that if individual impedance is measured, then the different components of the body could be estimated (1).

In the healthy living body, the cell membrane consists of a layer of non-conductive lipid material sandwiched between two layers of conductive protein molecules (1). The structure of cell membrane makes them a capacitive element which functions as capacitors when exposed to an alternating current. Theoretically, reactance is a measure of the volume of cell membrane capacitance and an indirect measure of the intracellular volume or body cell mass. Body fat, total body water and extra cellular water offer electric resistance to electrical current. Cell membranes and tissues interfaces offer capacitive reactance (2).

Phase angle is a linear method of measuring the relationship between electric resistance (R) and reactance (Rc) in series or parallel circuits. Taking the arc tangent value of the ratio of reactance versus electric resistance provides us with the phase angle value. Lower phase angles appear to be consistent with low reactance and equals either cell death or a breakdown in the selective permeability of the cell membrane. There is a significant difference in phase angle between healthy and disease states. The phase angle increases with improving clinical status (3-7). When repeated comparisons of body composition are required, BIA method can be as useful as Dexa scan (8). The difference can only be established if we have population reference values.

Concepts regarding physics and electrical nature of b ioelectrical impedance analysis

Resistance: It is the opposition caused by the substance to the flow of current. It is the property of substance. Ohm’s law states that the resistance of a substance is proportional to the voltage drop of an applied current as it passes through a resistive substance.

Resistance (Ohms) = applied voltage drop/ current (amps)

The body is made up of both conductive and non-conductive tissues. The conducting tissues are lean tissues with large amount of water and conducting electrolytes. In nonconductive tissues like bone and fat, the fluid content and conducting electrolytes are low.

Reactance (Ohms) = 1/2 × π × frequency × Capacitance

Where reactance is in Ohms, frequency in Hertz, capacitance in Farads and π is a constant. In this equation, we can see that reactance is the reciprocal of frequency and capacitance. Therefore, reactance decreases as frequency increases. It means that reactance is virtually infinite at extremely low frequencies. The capacitance increases with large surface area of the plate, with distance between the two plates and the type of dielectric. Dielectric is a non-conductor. But in biological systems it is found that the smaller the quantity of the membranes, the greater the capacitance. This paradox is explained by the way the capacitors and resistors are connected in the body. It is connected both in series and parallel. Capacitance causes the administered current to lag behind the voltage and creates a phase shift, which is represented by the phase angle (1). The electrical impedance of the body is measured by introducing a small alternating current, into the body and measuring the potential difference that results.

A specific feature of any conductor is its critical frequency. It is the frequency at which the reactance is maximum. As frequency increases further, the applied current will penetrate into all the cell membranes. So the cell membrane loses its capacitive properties, hence the reactance falls. So the impedance will only be electric resistance (9, 10). It was found that 50 KHz was ideal to be used in humans to measure both electric resistance and maximum reactance.

A study was conducted to investigate the prognostic role of PA in fifty-eight stage IV pancreatic carcinoma cases. This revealed that PA <5.0º had a median survival time of 6.3 (95% CI 3.5, 9.2) months (n 29), while those with PA >5.0º had a median survival time of 10.2 (95% CI 9.6, 10.8) months (n 29); this difference was statistically significant (P=0.02) (11).

Phase angle normal values range from 8-15º at 50 KHz in healthy Malawian adults (12). Mean phase angle for males, females and overall were 7.48±1.1º, 6.53±1.01º and 6.93±1.15º respectively. Whites were having 7.00±1.01º, Asians had 6.55±1.10º, African Americans had 7.21±1.19º, Hispanics had 7.33±1.13º and the rest had 7.45±0.48º (13).

The phase angle values have been studied in different countries across various populations (12, 13). The present study was designed to analyze the phase angle values for the normal Indian individuals and their anthropometric measurements.

Materials and Methods

Forty-two healthy subjects were chosen from the student community and general population in the age group of 18-50 yrs at a private hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Thirty subjects were males and twelve were females. Ethical clearance was obtained from Institute’s Ethical clearance review board. Informed consent was obtained using a specially designed consent form. Subjects were weighed in clothing using a digital load cell balance (Soehnle, West Germany) which had a precision of 0.1 kg. The heights of the subjects were recorded without footwear, using a vertically mobile scale (Holtain, Crymych, United Kingdom) and expressed to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the height and weight as follows; BMI= weight (kg)/height2 (meters).

Exclusion criteria

  • History of any chronic illness

  • Alcohol - more than 2 standard drinks per day

  • Signs of dehydration

  • Any implants

  • Fever

  • Menstruation and pregnancy

Phase angle measurement protocol

Bioelectrical impedance analysis is performed with the Quad scan instrument (BODYSTAT Quadscan 4000), applying a current of 500 to 800 micro amperes and 50 KHz frequency. After an overnight fast, the subjects were made to lie down supine on a bed in the metabolic lab for 10 min. History of any pacemaker or orthopedic hardware implant was taken along with history of food intake and recent exercise. The subjects were asked to separate the legs for 30º to 40º. Any jewellery on the person was removed. Ordinary ECG electrodes were used under aseptic conditions. Electrodes were applied on the right side with injecting electrodes placed on dorsum of hand and feet on the metacarpal and metatarsals respectively. The reading electrodes were placed between the medial and lateral malleolus of the same side. The reading electrodes of the wrist were placed between radial styloid and ulnar prominence of the wrist. The distance between injecting and reading electrodes was 5 cm.

The subjects were asked not to move when the instrument was measuring the Bioelectrical impedance. Single measurement was taken. In case of erroneous readings, the electrodes were re-applied and the measurement was repeated. Phase angle was calculated using the phase angle calculation software version 1.0 using the impedance at 50 KHz.

Results

The data was analysed statistically for normal distribution. Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 16.0, Kolmogrov-Smirnov and Pearson’s correlation tests were used for data analysis. Table 1 shows age in yrs, anthropometric measurements of the study group, impedance at 50 KHz and PA values. PA values for males and females are shown in Figure 1. Results revealed that PA values were significantly correlated with BMI in the study group (r=0.011, P<0.001) (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Phase angle and its standard deviation in males and females

Figure 1

*SD Standard Deviation

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Correlation between phase angle and BMI

Table 1.

Anthropometric measurements of study group

Parameters Mean ± SD* Range
Age (yrs) 32.64±12.25 18-50
Height (cm) 164.26±8.0 148.6-184
Weight (Kg) 60.47±10.14 41.3-79.2
BMI 22.39±3.42 15.9-28.7
Impedance at 50 K Hz (Ohm) 594.16±73.71 489-740
Phase angle (degree) 7.32±1.17 5-10

*SD Standard Deviation

Discussion

This study has demonstrated that the range of phase angle values in healthy subjects is 7.32±1.17º. According to the studies of Cristina et al the population reference values of phase angles of Asians and overall population were 6.55±1.10º 6.93±1.15º respectively (13). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was found to be as good as anthropometry in predicting body composition (14). Norman et al have mentioned the benefits of bio-impedance when calculation of body composition is not feasible (15).

One of the advantages of BIA over BMI alone is that BIA can differentiate the degree of body fat and body cell mass in individuals. It also can be used to assess the prognosis of chronic diseases like HIV infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16), tuberculosis, pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer (4, 12). Malnutrition and inflammation have a strong impact on PA in diseased individuals (17). BIA is a safe, cheap and easy method of measuring body composition.

But the disadvantage is that it has to be measured under ideal settings where room temperature, exercise, electrode placement and food intake are controlled (18). Changes in the hydration status can alter the impedance (19). Regarding the safety, perception depends on the intensity and threshold of the stimulus (much lower than 800 micro amperes), more in males and similar in females and children (20, 21). It is not validated in altered hydration status. In the case of pregnant women and children, risks are not evaluated.

Conclusions

This study showed the normal values of the phase angle in both genders which can be used to be compared with diseased states. Phase angle measurement in larger Indian population in different age groups needs to be studied further.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Dr Maruthy KN, MD, professor of physiology, for his technical assistance for the project and also Dr Srivatsa Shastry, MD, assistant professor for his editing of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kushner RF. Bioelectrical impedance analysis: A review of principles and applications. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:199–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Foster KR, Lukaski HC. Whole body impedance- what does it measure? Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:388–396. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.3.388S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cowen S, Hannan WJ, Ghosh S. Nutrition index determined by a portable multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis machine. GUT. 1998;42:144–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwenk A, Beisenherz A, Romer K, Kremer G, Salzberger B, Elia M. Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis remains an independent predictive marker in HIV infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment. Am J Clin Nutr . 2000;72:496–501. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.2.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Burrows JL, Dahlk SL, Vashi PG, Grutsch JF, et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr . 2004;80:1634–1638. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guglielmi FW, Mastronuzzi T, Pietrini L, Panarese A, Panella C, Francavilla A. Electrical bioimpedance methods: applications to medicine and biotechnology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;873:105–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09456.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schloerb PR, Forster J, Delcore R, Kindscher JD. Bioelectrical impedance in the clinical evaluation of liver disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:510–14. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.3.510S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Savastano S, Belfiore A, Di SommaC, Mauriello C, Rossi A, Pizza G, et al. Validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition changes after bariatric surgery in premenopausal morbidly women. Obes Surg. 2010;20:332–339. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-0006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lukaski HC. Biological indexes considered in the derivation of the bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:397–404. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.3.397S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guo SS, Chumlea WC, Cockram DB. Use of statistical methods to estimate body composition. Am J Clin Nutr . 1996;64:428–435. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.3.428S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gupta D, Lis CG, Dahlk SL, Vashi PG, Grutsch JF, Lammersfeld CA. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:957–962. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van lettowM, Kumwenda JJ, Harries AD, Whalen CC, Taha TE, Kumwenda N, et al. Malnutrition and the severity of lung disease in adults and pulmonary tuberculosis in Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:211–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cristina MG, Silva B, Aluisio JD, Barros AJD, Wang J, Heymsfield SB, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis: Population reference values for phase angle by age and Sex. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:49–52. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fuller NJ, Elia M. Potential use of bioelectrical impedance of the whole body and of body segments for the assessment of body composition: comparison with densitometry and anthropometry. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1989;43:779–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Norman K, Stobäus N, Pirlich M, Bosy-Westphal A. Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis - Clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.008. Jun 12. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walter-Kroker A, Kroker A, Mattiucci-Guehlke M, Glaab T. A practical guide to bioelectrical impedance analysis using the example of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nutr J . 2011;10:35. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stobäus N, Pirlich M, Valentini L, Schulzke JD, Norman K. Determinants of bioelectrical phase angle in disease. Br J Nutr . 2012;107:1217–1220. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511004028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kushner RF, Schoelle DA, Gudivaka R. Clinical characteristics influencing bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:423–427. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.3.423S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Steiner MC, Barton RL, Singh SJ, Morgan MDL. Bedside methods versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition measurement in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:626–631. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00279602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leitgeb N, Schrottner J, Cech R. Perception of ELF electromagnetic fields: excitation thresholds and inter-individual variability. Health Phys. 2007;92:591–595. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000243128.29337.aa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lindenblatt G, Silney J. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods. Science. 2006;7:933–946. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES