Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Feb 18;50(3):289–296. doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0868-x

Table 1.

Accuracy of online feedback

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 Average
16-P
 Acc (%) 73.2 93.3 86.7 73.3 80.0 93.3 66.7 93.3 93.3 83.7 ± 10.6
 ATV 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.7 3.3 2.9 4.0 3.0 ± 0.4
18-P
 Acc (%) 100 93.3 93.3 93.3 100 86.7 80.0 100 93.3 93.3 ± 6.7
 ATV 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.6 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.0 ± 0.4
21-P
 Acc (%) 100 93.3 93.3 93.3 100 93.3 86.7 100 93.3 94.8 ± 4.4
 ATV 3.1 2.9 3.3 3.4 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.0 2.7 3.0 ± 0.4

n-p” (n = {16, 18, 21}) corresponds to the 16-, 18- and 21-flash pattern

Acc Classification accuracy, ATV average trials for average of each subject