Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2013 Jan 27;27(3):348–358. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12074

Table 2.

The distribution of pathology scores and laboratory data in the patients with CGD. Panel A shows data for all CGD biopsies (n= 366) whereas Panel B shows data on 94 CGD biopsies with concomitant acute rejection.

Panel A: All CGD biopsies (n=366)*
Biopsy Score 0 1 2 3
i (interstitial inflammation) 45% 22% 13% 20%
t (tubulitis) 44% 21% 19% 15%
ci (interstitial fibrosis) 33% 43% 19% 4%
ct (tubular atrophy) 25% 51% 19% 5%
cv (vascular fibrosis) 63% 19% 16% 2%
cg (glomerulopathy) 88% 7% 2% 3%
ah (arteriolar hyaline thickening) 71% 20% 6% 3%
v (intimal artertitis) 89% 9% 1% 1%
g (glomerulitis) 86% 8% 5% 1%
Other Laboratory data Focal Positive Diffuse Positive Negative Not Done
C4D staining 8% 13% 70% 9%
Panel B: CGD biopsies with concomitant AR (n=94)
0 1 2 3
Biopsy Score
i (interstitial inflammation) 0% 0% 36% 64%
t (tubulitis) 0% 0% 49% 51%
ci (interstitial fibrosis) 30% 44% 21% 4%
ct (tubular atrophy) 27% 48% 20% 5%
cv (vascular fibrosis) 75% 10% 12% 3%
cg (glomerulopathy) 94% 4% 1% 1%
ah (arteriolar hyaline thickening) 77% 19% 3% 1%
v (intimal artertitis) 71% 24% 2% 3%
g (glomerulitis) 85% 9% 5% 1%
Other Laboratory data Focal Positive Diffuse Positive Negative Not Done
C4D staining positive 17% 24% 59% <1%
*

Less than (30) 1% missing biopsy scores.

ci and ct scores correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.88, p<0.0001); i and t scores correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.81, p<0.0001)

ci and ct scores correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.87, p<0.0001); i and t scores correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.55, p<0.0001)